3D TSV Technologies Scenarios: Via First or Via Last? 2010 report

Market Trends

The continuation of Moore’ s law by conventional CMOS scaling is becoming more and more challenging, requiring huge capital investments. 3D Packaging with 3D TSV interconnects provides another path towards the “More than Moore”, with relatively smaller capital investments. Despite the impact of the economic downturn, 3D integration investments are strategic innovations and have continued.

We have identified as of today more than 15 different 300mm 3-D IC pilot lines running or being installed world-wide (within R&D centers, at packaging houses, CMOS foundries or within IDM fabs).
This year, several initiatives of key industry leaders happened such as STMicro for 3D integration in MEMS and CMOS image sensors, Elpida for stacked DRAM memories and Sony with the introduction of Backside illuminated (BSI) technology into its camera sensor products portfolio.

Strong dynamics in MEMS, CMOS image sensors, memory, analog and logic industries continue and will drive adoption of 3D TSVs to high volumes within the next decade. Additionally, new applications such as HB-LED silicon modules, Solar and Power components are also on the point to catch the 3D TSV trend and to benefit from this disruptive interconnect technology!

BUT challenges are still ahead!

3D infrastructure & supply chain is the biggest immediate issue we have identified for the broad adoption of 3D Ics. As many scenarios are possible for the implementation of 3D TSV interconnects ( via first / via middle / via last), a big question at the moment is WHO will take the risk to invest and will have the ownership of the realization of the different 3D TSV process steps (to be implemented in front-end, mid-end, back-end…)? As a result, we have decided to release this year one new report called “3D TSV Technologies & Scenarios: Via First or Via Last?”. The analysis is focusing on the deeper understanding of the rationale behind these strategic technology choices to be made. It puts into perspective who is doing what at the moment, what alliances are forming at the horizon, which technology choices have already been made and for which applications?

I/O standardization between interfaces such as memory to digital layers is also a serious issue that needs to be fixed rapidly. Indeed, 3D integration of memory + logic Ics together is perceived as the next big wave for volume adoption of 3D TSV in the near future. Multiple applications are targeted, including CPU, GPU, DSP, FPGA, ASICs and Basebands Ics that will be used in future cell phones, super-computers, network / storage systems, notebooks, automotive and medical processing units among others.

Thermal management and reliability could also reduce 3D Ics application space in the longer run. However, different solutions are currently underway in response to this possible challenge.

More silicon value is moving to the package

A recent trend more and more these days are 3D interposers. Based on silicon or glass, 3D interposers are next generation substrate technology which aims at replacing traditional PCB laminate or ceramic technologies for the sake of extreme miniaturization and performance. This type of “intermediate 3D” is perceived as a “bridge” platform between today’ s 2D and future genuine 3D that will start beyond 2012-2013. Specific features like the integration of mature logic and analog functions such as IPD (integrated passive devices) will be key components in the effective commercialization of 3D interposers in the short term.

3D integration opens up a possible supply chain value change to all players as more and more value is now moving to the package in general. IDMs, Fab-less players, wafer foundries, packaging houses, MEMS players, substrate and PCB suppliers are all poised to take on more value in this new era if they all prepare for the investments it requires.

It is also astonishing to notice the rapid evolution of 3D thinking within the IC community: two years ago, the big unceasing question was “Why 3D?”. Today, moving forward with the concrete implementation of the technology, questions are “When 3D?” and “”How 3D?”. It is terrific to realize that in less than one decade from now, looking back at what has happened, we will be wondering “Why 2D?”

Key features of the Reports

  • Updated market forecasts & technology roadmaps for 3D IC components:
    • Impact of the economic downturn on the 3D TSV market
    • Market forecast update for MEMS, CMOS image sensors, logic, analog and memory applications
    • New application areas covered: HB-LED modules, power and solar components
    • Business case for 3D interposers: applications, market and players
  • 3D IC players 2008 market shares & revenues breakdown in $M (as packaging services or estimated in relative packaging value)
  • Supply chain perspectives, key players and emerging infrastructure for 3D Packaging
  • Strategic technology choices for 3D integration scenarios:
    • Analysis of the different possibility for the implementation of TSVs and the rationale behind (via first / via middle / via last / via after bonding)
    • Analysis of the cost structure for different implementation cases (vias in front-end, vias at packaging assembly house, C2W versus W2W, …)

Companies cited in the report

3D-Plus, 3M, Ablestik, Accretech, All-via, Altera, Ajisso, Alchimer, AMD, Alps Electric, Amkor, Anteryon, Applied Materials, Asia Pacific Microsytems, ASML, ASE, ASTRI, Aviza, ASET, Asahi Glass, Atotech, Avago technologies, Ayumi Industries, AZ Electronics, Brewer Science, Broadcom, Bosch, Chartered Semiconductor, Chipmos, DalsaSemiconductor, Datacon, Disco, Dongbu Hitek, Dow Corning, DuPont Electronics, Dynatex, E2V, Ebara, Elpida memories, EM Microelectronics, Enthone, ETRI, EVGroup, Fraunhofer IZM, Fraunhofer ISIT, Komatsu, Freescale, Fujikura, Fujitsu, Fujimi, Gemalto, Georgia Tech, Heptagon, HuaHong NEC, Hitachi, Hymite, Hynix Semiconductor, Ibiden, IBM, IME, IMEC, IMT, Infineon, Intel, ITRI, JCAP, LAM Research, Leti, Lintec, LSI Corp, Lord, Matsushita Electric Works, MagnaChip, Micron, MicroResist, MicroChem, Mitsui, Murata, Nanya, NEC Electronics, NEC Schott, Nemotek, Nexx, NEPES, Nextreme, Nitto Denko, Nokia, Numonyx, NXP, Oki Electric, OMG Ultra Pure Chemicals, Optopac, Panasonic, Philips Applied Technologies, Plan Optik, Process Partner International, Promerus, PVA Tepla, Qualcomm, Qimonda, R3Logic, Renesas, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Replisaurus, Samsung, Sanyo, Schott, Semitool, SensoNor, Sharp, Silex Microsystems, SiXiS, Sekisui, Sematech, Shinko Electric, Sony, SPIL, StatsChipPac, ST-Ericsson, STMicroelectronics, STS, SMIC, Shin-Etsu, Skyworks, Solvision, SOITEC, SUSS MicroTec, Synova, Tegal, Tessera, Texas Instruments, TSMC, Tezzaron, Toshiba, Tokyo Electron, Tohoku University, Touch MicrosystemTechnology, TOK, TSMC, UMC, UTAC, VTI Technologies, VTT Technology, Vertical Circuits, Xintec, Xsil, Xilinx, Ziptronix, ZyCube and more…

Benefits:

Who should buy this report?

  • Integrated semiconductor Device Manufacturers and fabless semiconductor companies
    • Benchmark the status of 3D integration within the industry
    • Identify possible partnership for your forthcoming developments and find a second source packaging subcontractors for your 3D TSV components
  • Assembly and Test Service companies
    • Get the list of the main 3D IC players and users
    • Screen possible new 3D integration applications to support diversification strategy
  • Equipment and Material suppliers
    • Understand the differentiated value of your products and technologies in this market
    • Identify new business opportunities and prospects
  • Electronic module makers and Original Equipment Makers
    • Evaluate the availability and benefits of using 3D components in your end system
    • Monitor different 3D component suppliers to adjust your sourcing strategy
  • PCB / IC substrate manufacturers
    • Monitor the evolution of IC Packaging & Assembly, especially linked to the emerging 3D TSV interposers, IPD and chip embedding PCB-based technologies
  • IC and MEMS Foundries
    • Spot new opportunities & define diversification strategies by reusing your infrastructure and expertise within the 3D Packaging market

Incoming search terms: 

3D TSV Technologies Scenarios: Via First or Via Last? 2010 report

Related Reports
  1. 3D IC & TSV Interconnects – Business Update 2010 Report
  2. New Report – Status of the MEMS Industry 2010
  3. Global and China Digital STB (Set-top Box) Market Report
  4. IMU & High Performance Inertial MEMS 2011
Tags: , ,

Read More
Posted by a on
categories: |

Global Dental Devices and Consumables Market (2010 – 2015)

Dental Devices and Consumables Market

Dental Device Market

Dental Market

Dental Implant Market

Report Summary


The dental devices report forecasts the size of global dental devices and consumables market over the period 2010 – 2015. The report analyses the key trends of the market, and segments the global dental equipment and consumables market by components and into various geographic regions (with the market size for each of these regions). Further, it discusses the key market drivers, restraints and opportunities of the global dental equipment and consumables market.

The global dental equipment and consumables market is estimated to be $27.6 billion by 2015, growing at a CAGR of 7%. The market is expected to grow because of the tremendous demand for dental biomaterial and dental implants. It is expected that the market for dental implants and dental biomaterials will grow at an overall CAGR of 6% and 10.5% respectively from 2010 – 2015. The main driving element for global dental equipment market is the advancement in technologies that are available to dentists’ for treating their patients.
The growth of this market is expected to be highest in the U.S. and EU where the generation of aging baby boomers can afford the quality but expensive dental procedures. This is also expected to be a catalyst for the growth and popularity of cosmetic treatments and implants along with the increasing demand for better orthodontic products by youngsters.

The emerging technology will reduce the overall turnaround time for dental procedures while improving efficiency of the dental practitioners. For example, introduction of CAD/CAM has reduced designing time for dental crowns and bridges and 3D imaging techniques have improved patient diagnosis and procedure planning. Improvements in the field of dental biomaterials and tissue regenerative material have enabled the dentists to offer more natural and longtime dental solutions. Dentists are now educating their patients about dental products, which has helped in improving customer awareness about products and the latest available technologies. Changing consumer needs and a shift towards cosmetic dentistry will drive the market for hi-end dental solutions.

Stiff competition exists among the industry participants due to product differentiation, technology and pricing. This is more evident among dental companies resulting in companies adopting strategies like technology integration, product improvement and re-branding.

Scope of the report


The report segments the Global Dental Devices and Consumables Market based on:
  • General and diagnostic devices market
  • Treatment based devices market
  • Other dental devices market
  • Dental consumables market
Each segment of the report will provide market tables, drivers, restraints and opportunities along with the key players and competitive landscape. This report will also provide more than 100 market tables for various geographic regions covering the sub-segments and micro-markets. In addition, the report provides over 28 company profiles for each of its sub-segments, such as dental chair manufacturers, implants manufacturers, other devices manufacturers etc.

What makes our reports unique?
  • We provide the longest market segmentation chain in this industry- not many reports provide market breakdown upto level 5.
  • We provide 10% customization. Normally it is seen that clients do not find specific market intelligence that they are looking for. Our customization will ensure that you necessarily get the market intelligence you are looking for and we get a loyal customer.
  • We conduct detailed market positioning, product positioning and competitive positioning. Entry strategies, gaps and opportunities are identified for all the stakeholders.
  • Comprehensive market analysis for the following sectors:
Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices, Biotechnology, Semiconductor and Electronics, Energy and Power Supplies, Food and Beverages, Chemicals, Advanced Materials, Industrial Automation, and Telecom and IT. We also analyze retailers and super-retailers, technology providers, and research and development (R&D) companies.

THE REPORT ANSWERS THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
  • Which are the high-growth segments/cash cows and how is the market segmented in terms of applications and materials?
  • What are market estimates and forecasts; which markets are doing well and which are not?
  • Where are the gaps and opportunities; what is driving the market?
  • Which are the key playing fields? Which are the winning edge imperatives?
  • How is the competitive outlook; who are the main players in each of the segments; what are the key selling products; what are their strategic directives, operational strengths and product pipelines? Who is doing what?
Powerful Research and analysis

The analysts working with MarketsandMarkets come from renowned publishers and market research firms, globally, adding their expertise and domain understanding. We get the facts from over 22,000 news and information sources, a huge database of key industry participants and draw on our relationships with more than 900 market research companies across the world. We, at MarketsandMarkets, are inspired to help our clients grow by providing qualitative business insights with our huge market intelligence repository.
 

Related Reports
  1. Global Dental Consumables Market
  2. U.S. Market for Hearing Aids and Audiology Devices 2010 (Includes Audiologist Survey)
  3. UK Orthopedic Devices Market Analysis and Forecasts to 2015
  4. Global Dental Devices and Consumables Market
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Read More
Posted by a on
categories: |

Global Mobile Application Market (2010-2015)

Mobile Application Market

Report Summary


The success of Apple’s Application Store has not only established the salability of mobile applications, but has also shown that the most excellent applications offer the potential to generate large amount of revenues. Several telecom giants have thus begun providing dedicated application stores for their users, so much so that more than 2 million applications are currently available for communications, games, multimedia, productivity, travel, and utility purposes.

About 6.4 billion (free, paid, and ad-supported) application downloads were made globally in 2009 alone from native (on-deck) and third-party (off-deck) application stores, generating revenues of $4.5 billion in the same year. Apple, with 2.5 billion downloads, dominated the applications market in 2009. However, new players like Google, Nokia, and RIM are rapidly entering the applications market space, as the increasing uptake and usability of smartphone devices further boosts the mobile applications market. According to our estimates, the global mobile applications market is expected to be worth $25.0 billion in 2015, growing at a CAGR of 29.6% from 2010 to 2015.

Markets Covered

The study includes native (downloadable) mobile applications (not web-based applications) for mobile devices like smartphones and feature phones (not iPad or tablet PCs). The market segmentation on the basis of store type includes on-deck (operators, mobile device manufacturers, and Operating System (OS) developers managed) and off-deck (independent or third-party managed) stores. This research report categorizes the global market for mobile applications on the basis of

Mobile applications categories:
  • Games
  • Social Networking
  • Books
  • Entertainment
  • Business and Finance
  • Lifestyle
  • Productivity
  • Travel
  • Navigation
  • Utilities
  • Others
Business model (store) types:
  • Native or on deck
  • Third party or off deck
Market participants:
  • OS/handset manufacturers
  • Application developers
  • Operators
The report provides market estimates and forecasts for the global mobile applications markets in North America, Europe, Asia, and Rest of the World (ROW). In addition to market sizing and forecasts, the report also offers a detailed analysis of the market trends, opportunities, and the factors influencing the growth of each segment of the mobile applications market. The report also draws a competitive landscape, analyzing core competencies of major players and strategies adopted to expand their market presence.

Stakeholders

The targeted audience for this report includes:

  • Handset manufacturers
  • Mobile phone operators
  • Mobile software developers
  • Application store providers
  • Retail electronics distributors
  • Enterprises and businesses that require business-specific applications and publish their own applications
Research Methodology
  • The report uses a combination of primary and secondary research to arrive at market estimates.
  • The size of the mobile applications market is calculated using a bottom-up approach; using volume (downloads/year) and prices validated by the key market participants such as CEOs, VPs, and product managers.
  • Market sizes were also verified by the cost volume approach.
  • Prices and pricing trends in different geographies were identified and analyzed through secondary research, and the average selling price per unit calculated.
  • All currencies were converted into USD, based on which the weighted average price of a mobile application was calculated.
  • Geographical market split was arrived at by determining users, cost of applications, and the adoption rate in different regions.

Mobile Application Market

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Read More
Posted by a on
categories: |

Medical Enzymes AG

Medical Enzymes AG-Detailed Product Pipeline


Medical Enzymes AG-Detailed Product Pipeline report contains detailed information on pipelines by phase and therapeutic indication as well as management information,deals and alliances and recent news on the company including key milestones.

Scope of the report

Each Life Science Analytics’ Pipeline Report provides the user with real detail on a company’s pipeline.
In addition to business summaries, contact information, company details and selected financial data, each report also contains extensive information in tabular and graphical formats on a company’s product pipeline and disease hub classification.

Product details consist of complete descriptions, therapeutic indication, drug class, mechanism of action and clinical trial information. Every report also includes detail on a company’s deals and alliances and recent corporate news including key milestones.

Key benefits

* Understand a company’s strategic position by accessing detailed independent intelligence on its product pipeline.
* Keep track of your competitors and partners by better understanding their product pipeline.
* Monitor a company’s research effectiveness by determining pipeline depth and numbers of products in development by clinical phase.
TOC

Business Summary
Product Glance
–Products by Phase of Development
–Products by Disease Hub Classification
–Products by Indication
Product Summary
Product Details

Market Research News

Related Reports:
  1. Global Industrial Enzymes Market: An Analysis
  2. Enzymes in Industrial Applications: Global Markets
  3. Medical Enzymes AG-Detailed Product Pipeline
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Read More
Posted by a on
categories: |

Report Summary

Datamonitor’s Global Top 10 Global Insurance Companies report profiles the leading players in the insurance market worldwide. This sector consists of companies operating in life, health, and property and casualty insurance markets. Values in this report refer to the direct premiums written by Insurance companies. The market share value is based on companies’ direct premiums from life, health, property and casualty insurances.

The report analyzes the sector in terms of market value, market share, market segmentation, key drivers and resistors, trends and competitive positioning. It includes details of the top 10 companies in the industry along with five-year financial analysis and in-depth SWOT profiles.

Key features of this report
  • Market dynamics in the insurance sector during the period 2009–14
  • The market’s key drivers and resistors
  • Trends in the insurance sector
  • Identification and analysis of the top 10 insurance players globally
  • Details of the performance of the top 10 companies during 2005–09
Scope of this report
  • Analyze the global top 10 insurance companies and the sector overall using key industry metrics, including market value, market shares, market segmentation and growth forecasts
  • Assess the intensity of the competition in the industry using the five forces model, covering the degree of rivalry, the danger posed by substitutes, the risk represented by new entrants, buyer power and supplier power
  • Investigate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats and access five-year financial analysis for the top 10 players in the sector
  • Peruse descriptive profiles of the leading players, including details of the strategic initiatives undertaken in the last 12 months
  • Understand the major issues affecting the global insurance sector
  • Save time, money and resources by analyzing the top 10 insurance companies using this report
Key issues examined
  • An examination of the performance of the global insurance sector on the basis of sales and their respective growth patterns over the past five years
  • In-depth analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats for the top 10 insurance companies along with business overviews and financial summaries
  • Benchmarking of the financial performance of each of the top 10 insurance companies players for the past five years, including comparisons of revenues, profitability analysis and industry-specific ratios
Highlights
  • The global insurance market has been showing significant growth during 2006-09, despite a slowdown in 2009. Growth will accelerate into the forecast period (2009–14).
  • The global insurance market size is estimated at $3,671.8 billion in 2009, representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.7% for the period spanning 2005–09. The industry growth is forecast to accelerate, with an anticipated CAGR of 6.7% for the five-year period 2009–14, to reach $5,082.7 billion by the end of 2014.
Key questions answered in this report
  • What was the market size of the global insurance sector by value in 2009?
  • What will the market size be during 2009–14?
  • What are the trends in the global insurance sector?
  • Who are the top 10 players in the industry?
  • What are the strengths of the top 10 companies in the global insurance sector?
  • What are the weaknesses of the top 10 players?
  • What are the growth opportunities for the top 10 firms?
  • What are the threats faced by global insurance companies?

Top 10 Insurance Companies

Global Top 10 Insurance Companies – Industry, Financial and SWOT Analysis

Global Top 10 Insurance Companies – Industry, Financial and SWOT Analysis

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Read More
Posted by a on
categories: |

DNA Sequencing Market Trends (Kalorama Survey of Lab Using Next-Gen and Capillary Systems)

DNA Sequencing Market Trends


Report Summary


This report and survey, conducted by Justin Saeks, Kalorama Information’s senior biotech analyst and author of our DNA Sequencing Markets report, attempts to answer these questions and more, taking a quantitative view of the sequencing marketplace. The survey encompasses next-gen and capillary systems, with an emphasis on trends in second- and third-generation systems. Academic, research, government and other labs were interviewed for this study.

The DNA sequencer market has undergone rapid changes in the last few years, unlike during any period in its history and unlike most technologies except the computer or the chip. The rapid ongoing technological advances have enabled a Moore’s Law type of phenomenon in relation to the cost of sequencing and the output of the systems.

Kalorama Information’s DNA Sequencing Market Trends (Kalorama Survey of Labs Using Next-Gen and Capillary Systems) aims to identify some of the key changes taking place with both next-generation systems and capillary sequencers in relation to their usage in labs.

This market study includes:
  • Status of Next-Gen and Third-Gen Systems
  • Future Purchasing Plans and Time Frame
  • Run Frequencies
  • Sequencing Applications
  • Features Liked and Disliked by Brand (454, ABI SOLID, Illumina)
  • U.S. vs. Europe and Rest of World Stats
  • Over 105 Exhibits to Illuminate Survey
  • Main Challenges/Bottlenecks to Usage
  • Difficulty of Data Analysis by Brand/Type
  • Difficulty of Data Management by Brand/Type
  • Sequencing Models Respondents Are Likely to Consider
  • Verbatim Comments of Respondents
  • Analyst Conclusions
Based on an Analyst-Conducted Survey of 120 Labs

The study focuses on a survey of 120 laboratories which was carried out from July to September of 2010, with the majority in the latter portion. Specific lab names are not mentioned in the report. About 70% of the labs were academic, the remainder were hospital, government or independent labs. 70% of hospitals are in North America, 12% in Europe and 18% in ROW. The bulk of respondents were core labs with more than a third doing contract work.

The survey was conducted by the author of DNA Sequencing and Equipment Markets, published in several editions. The survey effort targeted any lab that uses a sequencer for any application, but with the goal of achieving as close a representative breadth of labs as possible. Due to the increasing importance of second- and third-generation systems in the market, the scope leans towards these types of sequencers. However, the market inevitably includes labs that use both. The mix of labs reached in the surveys provides both diverse industry segments as well as groups of labs with both types of systems, only capillary systems, or only next-generation systems.

Labs were mostly contacted by phone and asked to participate in a phone interview/survey for around 10 to 15 minutes. A small fraction of the labs completed the survey on a website set up with the questions. The survey included both open-ended and multiple-choice type questions. In most cases, 59% of labs, the lab manager was the party interviewed. Research scientists or associates were spoken to in 39% of cases. The remaining 19% of respondents were technicians, executives, professors or others.



Table Of Contents

CHAPTER ONE: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
Scope
Methodology
Outline
Demographics
Major Conclusions
CHAPTER TWO: DEMOGRAPHICS
Demographics
Industrial Distribution of Respondents’ Labs
Laboratory Function of Respondents’ Labs
Distribution by Number of Sequencers
Total Numbers of Systems in Labs
Numbers of 2nd and 3rd Generation Systems
Numbers of Capillary/ Gel Systems
Number of Sequencers in Other Labs
Brand(s)/ Types(s) of Sequencers Owned, Overall
Types of Sample Being Studied
Position/ Role of Respondents
CHAPTER THREE: SYSTEM INSTALLATIONS
Overall Installed Base
Distribution of Sequencer Models
Overall Totals
Versions of 2nd-Generation Systems
Installed Base by Next-Gen vs Capillary: System Owned
Distribution of Number of Sequencers
Installed Base by Region
Overall Brand/ Type
Next-Generation Systems
Capillary / Gel Systems
Installed Base by Industry Segment
Overall Brand/ Type
Next-Generation Systems
Capillary / Gel Systems
Installed Base by Laboratory Function
Overall Brand/ Type
Next-Generation Systems
System Prices
Date of Installation
Distribution by Next-Generation vs Capillary
CHAPTER FOUR: APPLICATIONS AND USAGE TRENDS
Frequency of Sequencer Runs
Next-Generation Systems
Capillary Systems
Outsourcing
Output, Read Lengths, Single- or Paired-Ends
Next-Generation Systems
Capillary Systems
Targeted Enrichment Systems Being Used
CHAPTER FIVE: PREFERENCES AND EVALUATIONS
CHAPTER SIX: FUTURE PURCHASE PLANS
TABLE OF EXHIBITS
CHAPTER ONE: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Exhibit ES-1: Distribution of Survey Respondent Labs, by Type
CHAPTER TWO: DEMOGRAPHICS
Exhibit 1: Regional Distribution of Labs (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, R.O.W)
Exhibit 2: Industrial Distribution of Labs (Academia, Hospital, Indep. Research/Non-profit, Contract Rsch/ Svcs, Gov’t, Other)
Exhibit 3: Industrial Distribution of Labs, by Region (# of Labs)
Exhibit 4: Industrial Distribution of Labs, Cross-Referenced by Region (% of Labs)
Exhibit 5: Major Function(s) of Labs (Core Lab, Service Provider, Research, Genome Center, Diagnostics, Teaching, Bioinformatics, Overall)
Exhibit 6: Major Function(s) of Labs, by Region (# of Labs)
Exhibit 7: Major Function(s) of Labs, Cross Referenced by Region (% of Labs)
Exhibit 8: Distribution of Total Number of Sequencers in Respondent Labs
Exhibit 9: Distribution of Number of Next-Generation Sequencers in Labs
Exhibit 10: Distribution of Number of Capillary/ Gel Sequencers in Labs
Exhibit 11: Distribution of Number of Sequencers Elsewhere in Organization
Exhibit 12: Brands/ Types of Sequencers Owned Overall in Respondent Labs(Next gen, ABI/Life Tech., ABI Capillary/ Gel, Illumina, 454, ABI SOLiD, No sequencer)
Exhibit 13: Average Number of Sequencers in Respondent Labs, by Brand/ Type
Exhibit 14: Main Types of Samples Being Sequenced in Labs (Human, Bacteria, Plant, Agricultural, Animals, Variety, Other)
Exhibit 15: Distribution of Positions/ Roles of Respondents
CHAPTER THREE: SYSTEM INSTALLATIONS
Exhibit 16: Installed Base of Respondent Labs, by Model
Exhibit 17: Distribution of ABI SOLiD System Versions in Respondents’ Labs
Exhibit 18: Installed Base of Models in Labs, by Brand/ Type of System(s) Owned (# of Systems)
Exhibit 19: Installed Base of Models in Labs, Cross-Referenced by Brand/ Type of System(s) Owned (% of Systems)
Exhibit 20: Installed Base of Labs by Brand/ Type of System Owned, Cross-Referenced by Model (% of Systems)
Exhibit 21: Distribution of Number of Sequencers, by Number of Next-Generation Systems vs Number of Capillary Systems (# of Labs)
Exhibit 22: Distribution of Number of Sequencers, by Number of Next-Generation Systems vs Number of Capillary Systems (% of Labs)
Exhibit 23: Distribution of Number of Sequencers, by Number of Capillary Systems vs Number of Next-Generation Systems (% of Labs)
Exhibit 24: Average Number of Systems Installed in Respondent Labs, by Region (N. America, Europe, Asia, R.O.W.)
Exhibit 25: Sequencer Models in Respondent Labs, by Region (# of Systems)
Exhibit 26: Sequencer Models in Respondent Labs, by Region (% of Systems)
Exhibit 27: Next-Gen Sequencer Models in Respondent Labs, by Region (# of Systems)
Exhibit 28: Next-Gen Sequencer Models in Respondent Labs, by Region (% of Systems)
Exhibit 29: Capillary and Gel Sequencer Models in Labs, by Region (# of Systems)
Exhibit 30: Capillary and Gel Sequencer Models in Labs, by Region (% of Systems)
Exhibit 31: Average Number of Sequencers Installed by Industry/ Segment (Academic, Hospital, Indep. Rsch/ Non-profit, Contract Research/ Svcs, Government, Other)
Exhibit 32: Industrial Distribution of Systems, by Brand/ Type (# of Systems)
Exhibit 33: Industrial Distribution of Systems, by Brand/ Type (% of Systems)
Exhibit 34: Brand/ Type of Sequencer System Installed, Cross-Referenced by Industry/ Segment (% of Systems)
Exhibit 35: Number of Next-Generation Systems in Labs Owning, by Industry/Segment (Academic, Hospital, Indep. Rsch/ Non-profit, Contract Rsch/ Svcs, Gov’t, Other)
Exhibit 36: Industrial Distribution of Next-Generation Sequencers, by Model (# of Systems)
Exhibit 37: Industrial Distribution of Next-Generation Sequencers, by Model (% of Systems)
Exhibit 38: Next-Generation Models in Respondent Labs, by Industry/ Segment (% of Systems)
Exhibit 39: Capillary/Gel Systems Installed in Lab Owning, by Industry/Segment (Academic, Hospital, Indep. Rsch/ Non-profit, Contract Rsch/ Svcs, Gov’t, Other)
Exhibit 40: Industrial Distribution of Capillary/Gel Sequencers, by Model (# of Systems)
Exhibit 41: Industrial Distribution of Capillary/Gel Sequencers, by Model (% of Systems)
Exhibit 42: Capillary/ Gel Sequencer Models in Labs, by Industry/ Segment (% of Systems)
Exhibit 43: Average Number of Systems Installed by Laboratory Function
Exhibit 44: Distribution of Systems by Lab Function, by Brand/ Type (# of Systems)
Exhibit 45: Distribution of Systems by Lab Function, by Brand/ Type (% of Systems)
Exhibit 46: Brand/Type of System Installed, Cross-Referenced by Lab Function (% of Systems)
Exhibit 47: Average Number of Next-Generation Systems in Labs Owning, by Lab Function
Exhibit 48: Next Generation Models in Respondent’s Labs, by Lab Function (# of Systems)
Exhibit 49: Distribution of Next-Generation Systems by Lab Function, Cross-Referenced by Model (% of Systems)
Exhibit 50: Next Generation Models in Respondent Labs, by Lab Function (% of Systems)
Exhibit 51: Average Number of Capillary/ Gel Systems in Labs Owning, By Lab Function
Exhibit 52: Distribution of Capillary/ Gel Sequencers by Lab Function, by Model (# of Systems)
Exhibit 53: Distribution of Capillary/ Gel Sequencers by Lab Function, by Model (% of Systems)
Exhibit 54: Capillary/ Gel Sequencer Models in Labs, by Lab Function (% of Systems)
Exhibit 55: Age of Next-Generation and Capillary Systems Installed in Labs, Q1 2000 – Q4 2004
Exhibit 56: Age of Next-Generation and Capillary Systems Installed in Labs, Q1 2005 – Q3 2010
Exhibit 57: Age of Next-Generation Systems in Respondent Labs by Model, Q3 2005 – Q3 2010
CHAPTER FOUR: APPLICATIONS AND USAGE TRENDS
Exhibit 58: Distribution of Runs/ Libraries by Application, by Brand/ Type (% of Samples)
Exhibit 59: Applications Expected to Increase the Most
Exhibit 60: Applications Expected to Increase the Most, for Next-Generation Systems
Exhibit 61: Applications Expected to Increase the Most, Capillary/Gel System Owners
Exhibit 62: Applications Expected to Increase the Most, by Brand/ Type Owned (# of Labs)
Exhibit 63: Applications Expected to Increase the Most, by Brand/ Type Owned (% of Labs)
Exhibit 64: Frequency that Next-Generation Systems are Running (# of Systems)
Exhibit 65: Frequency that Next-Generation Systems are Running (% of Systems)
Exhibit 66: Distribution of Number of Plates Run per Week, for Capillary Systems
Exhibit 67: Overall Distribution of Outsourcing of Sequencing
Exhibit 68: Regional Distribution of Outsourcing of Sequencing (# of Labs)
Exhibit 69: Regional Distribution of Outsourcing of Sequencing (% of Labs)
Exhibit 70: Distribution of Reasons for Outsourcing of Sequencing
Exhibit 71: Distribution of Typical Read Lengths of Capillary Systems
Exhibit 72: Distribution of Targeted Enrichment Systems Used by Labs
Exhibit 73: Distribution of Systems Used to Check Concentration, Size, Quality

CHAPTER FIVE: PREFERENCES AND EVALUATIONS

Exhibit 74: Labs’ Most Important Criteria for Sequencer Purchase
Exhibit 75: Labs’ Most Important Criteria for Sequencer Purchase, by Brand/ Type Owned (# of Labs)
Exhibit 76: Labs’ Most Important Criteria for Sequencer Purchase, by Brand/ Type Owned (% of Labs)
Exhibit 77: Labs’ Satisfaction Ratings of System Features by Brand/ Type (1-very dissatisf., 2-somewhat dissatisf., 3-avg. or indifferent, 4-slightly satisf., 5-very satisf.)
Exhibit 78: Satisfaction Ratings of Next-Generation System Features by Brand (1-very dissatisf., 2-somewhat dissatisf., 3-avg. or indifferent, 4-slightly satisf., 5-very satisf.)
Exhibit 79: Feature or Process Most Wanted to Change or Improve, by Brand/ Type (# of Labs)
Exhibit 80: Feature(s) or Process Most Wanted to Change or Improve, by Brand/Type (% of Labs)
Exhibit 81: Main Bottleneck(s) in Sequencing Process (# of Labs)
Exhibit 82: Main Bottleneck(s) in Sequencing Process (% of Labs)
Exhibit 83: Difficulty of Data Analysis, by Brand/ Type (# of Labs)
Exhibit 84: Difficulty of Data Analysis, by Brand/ Type (% of Labs)
Exhibit 85: Difficulty of Data Management, by Brand/ Type (# of Labs)
Exhibit 86: Difficulty of Data Management, by Brand/ Type (% of Labs)
CHAPTER SIX: FUTURE PURCHASE PLANS
Exhibit 87: Time Frame for Sequencer Purchase Plan(s)
Exhibit 88:Time Frame(s) for Sequencer Purchase Plan(s) (# and % of Systems)
Exhibit 89: Time Frame(s) for Sequencer Purchase Plan(s), by Brand/ Type Owned (# of Systems)
Exhibit 90: Time Frame(s) for Sequencer Purchase Plan(s), by Brand/ Type Owned (% of Systems)
Exhibit 91: Time Frame(s) for Sequencer Purchase Plan(s), by Industry/ Segment (# of Systems)
Exhibit 92: Time Frame(s) for Sequencer Purchase Plan(s), by Industry/ Segment (% of Systems)
Exhibit 93: Time Frame(s) for Sequencer Purchase Plan(s), by Lab Function (# of Systems)
Exhibit 94: Time Frame(s) for Sequencer Purchase Plan(s), by Industry/ Segment (% of Systems)
Exhibit 95: Time Frame(s) for Sequencer Purchase Plan(s), by Region (# of Systems)
Exhibit 96: Time Frame(s) for Sequencer Purchase Plan(s), by Region (% of Systems)
Exhibit 97: Sequencer Models Likely to Consider for Future Purchase
Exhibit 98: Sequencer Models Likely to Consider, by Brand/ Type Owned (# of Labs)
Exhibit 99: Sequencer Models Likely to Consider, by Brand/ Type Owned (% of Labs)
Exhibit 100: Sequencer Models Likely to Consider, Capillary/ Gel System-Only Owners
Exhibit 101: Sequencer Models Likely to Consider, Next-Generation System-Only Owners
Exhibit 102: Sequencer Models Likely to Consider, by Industry/ Segment (# of Labs)
Exhibit 103: Sequencer Models Likely to Consider, by Industry/ Segment (% of Labs)
Exhibit 104: Sequencer Models Likely to Consider, by Lab Function (# of Labs)
Exhibit 105: Sequencer Models Likely to Consider, by Lab Function (% of Labs)
Exhibit 106: Sequencer Models Likely to Consider, by Region (# of Labs)
Exhibit 107: Sequencer Models Likely to Consider, by Region (% of Labs)
Exhibit 108: Barriers or Issues Hindering 2nd and 3rd Generation Sequencers (# of Labs)
Exhibit 109: Barriers or Issues Hindering 2nd and 3rd Generation Sequencers (% of Labs)

How To Buy This Report

To buy this report you can visit any of the site mentioned below
http://www.reportsnreports.com/reports/42637-dna-sequencing-market-trends-kalorama-survey-of-lab-using-next-g.html

, ,  
Market Research News DNA Sequencing Market Trends

Read More
Posted by a on
categories: |

Global Industrial Enzymes Market: An Analysis

The current report offers a detailed insight of the global industrial enzymes market. Technological developments and product innovations have fuelled the application of enzymes in various industrial sectors in the past few years. Industrial enzymes can typically replace conventional chemicals, getting more out of raw materials and increasing the efficiency of production processes.

On the basis of application, industrial enzymes could be divided into four major categories, i.e. detergent enzymes, technical enzymes, food enzymes and feed enzymes. The technical enzymes segment could further be divided into textile enzymes, leather enzymes, pulp and paper enzymes, fuel ethanol enzymes and others. The major enzymes used in industrial enzymes market are amylase, lipase, protease, ligase, phytase, cellulose, xylanase etc. Food enzymes constitute the major market share of the all four categories of industrial enzymes as of 2009. However the y-o-y growth registered by technical enzymes segment was highest in past 4-5 years due to dramatic growth of the fuel ethanol enzymes segment. The global fuel ethanol enzymes industry constituted about 11% of the global industrial enzymes market in 2009 and the market has increased at an annual growth rate of 15%-20% in the past few years.

Industrial enzymes operates in an oligopolistic market with the presence of three major suppliers, Novozymes A/S (headquartered in Denmark), Genencor International Inc. (headquartered in the U.S.), and DSM N.V (headquartered in the Netherlands). Their main market segments are food (e.g., dairy, baking, brewing, beverage), animal feed, and technical applications. Novozymes is the largest supplier in each of these three sectors, with an estimated market share of 47% of the industrial enzyme market in 2009.

By combining SPSS Inc.’s data integration and analysis capabilities with our relevant findings, we have predicted the future growth of the industry. We employed various significant variables that have an impact on this industry and created regression models with SPSS Base to determine the future direction of the industry. Before deploying the regression model, the relationship between several independent or predictor variables and the dependent variable was analyzed using standard SPSS output, including charts, tables and tests.

TOC

1. Industrial Enzymes
1.1 Enzymes: A Brief Overview
1.2 Industrial Enzymes: Value Chain Analysis
2. Global Industrial Enzyme Market
3. Market Segmentation
3.1 Detergent enzymes
3.2 Food Enzymes
3.3 Technical Enzymes
3.3.1 Textile Industry
3.3.2. Leather Industry
3.3.3. Pulp and Paper Industry
3.3.4. Fuel Ethanol Industry
3.4 Feed Enzyme
4. Market Drivers
4.1 Innovation
4.2 Growing Population
4.3 Growing Fuel Ethanol Market
4.4 Increasing Health Consciousness
4.5 Growing Demand of Animal Nutrition
4.6. Rising Detergent Market
5. Key Challenges
5.1 Rising Input Costs
5.2 Stringent Regulations
5.3 Rising Energy Prices
6. Competitive Landscape
7. Company Profiles
7.1 Novozymes
7.1.1 Business Overview
7.1.2. Revenue and Income Analysis
7.1.3 Business Strategies
7.2 Danisco
7.2.1 Business Overview
7.2.2. Revenue and Income Analysis
7.2.3 Business Strategies
7.3 DSM
7.3.1 Business Overview
7.3.2. Revenue and Income Analysis
7.3.3 Business Strategies
8. Market Outlook
8.1 Market Forecast
8.2 Forecast Methodology
8.2.1 Dependent and Independent Variables
8.2.2 Correlation Analysis
8.2.3 Regression Analysis
List of Tables
Segmentation of Global Enzyme Market by size, 2009
Industrial Enzymes: Y-o-Y Growth Rate of Market segments
Enzymes used in Leather Making Process
Enzyme Application in Paper and Pulp Industry
New Product Launches by Industrial Enzyme Industry, 2004-2008
Household Detergent Market of A.I.S.E Member Countries, 2009
Industrial & Institutional Detergent Market of A.I.S.E Member Countries, 2009
Financial Position of Key Players, 2009
Dependent & Independent Variables (2003– 2009)
Correlation Matrix
Model Summary – Coefficient of Determination
Regression Coefficients Output
List of Figures
Value Chain of Industrial Enzyme Industry
Global Market Size and Growth Rate of Industrial Enzymes, 2003-2009
Industrial Enzymes: Global Market Segmentation, 2009
Global Detergent Enzyme Market, 2006-2009
Penetration of Enzymes into World Laundry Detergent Market
Global Food Enzymes Market, 2002-2009
Segmentation of Global Food Enzymes Market, 2009
Global Textile Enzyme Market, 2006-2009
Global Textile Industry Growth, 2003-2010e
Global Leather Enzyme Market, 2006-2009
Paper and Pulp Enzyme Market, 2006-2009
Global Fuel Ethanol Enzymes Market, 2006-2009
US Fuel Ethanol Production, 1990-2009
Global Fuel Ethanol Production (country wise), 2008
Enzyme Use Cost per Gallon Bioethanol, 2007-2010
Production Cost per Gallon Bioethanol, 2007-2010
Global Feed Enzymes Market, 2006-2009
Global Adjusted Feedstock Availability
Estimated Production MG/Year based on Adjusted Feedstock
Survey of Enzyme Users: Most Important Factor in Choosing One Supplier Relative to Another
Global Population Growth, 2000-2009
Global Grains and Oil Seed Production and Use
US RFS Mandate- Mandated US Production of Biofuels, 2008-2022
Global Obese Population, 2002-2009e
World Meat Market Growth Rate 2007 vs 2008
Household Detergent Market, 2009
Industrial and Institutional Detergent Market, 2009
Market share of Industrial Enzymes Players, 2009
Revenues of Novozymes, 2005-2009
Novozymes Revenue, Segment Breakdown, 2009
Net Income of Novozymes, 2005-2009
Revenues of Danisco, 2006-2010
Danisco Revenue, Segment Breakdown, 2009/10
Net Income of Danisco, 2006-2010
Revenues of DSM, 2005-2009
DSM Revenue, Segment Breakdown, 2009
Net Income of DSM, 2005-2009
Global Industrial Enzymes Market Forecast: 2009A-2014F
Market Research News

Related Reports
  1. Enzymes in Industrial Applications: Global Markets
  2. Global Industrial Enzymes Market: An Analysis
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Read More
Posted by a on
categories: |

Enzymes in Industrial Applications: Global Markets

Report Summary


The global market for industrial enzymes is estimated at $3.3 billion in 2010. This market is expected to reach $4.4 billion by 2015, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6% over the 5-year forecast period.
Technical enzymes are valued at just over $1 billion in 2010. This sector will increase at a 6.6% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) to reach $1.5 billion in 2015. The highest sales of technical enzymes occurred in the leather market, followed by the bioethanol market.

The food and beverage enzymes segment is expected to reach about $1.3 billion by 2015, from a value of $975 million in 2010, rising at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.1%. Within the food and beverage enzymes segment, the milk and dairy market had the highest sales, with $401.8 million in 2009.

INTRODUCTION

STUDY OBJECTIVES

BCC’s goal in conducting this study is to provide an overview of the current and future characteristics of the global market for industrial enzymes. The key objective is to present a comprehensive analysis of the current market and its future direction in the enzymes market as an important tool for increasing the efficiency and specificity of the products in which the enzymes are used.

This report explores present and future strategies within the industrial enzymes market, which includes the following segments: detergents, technical, food and beverages, and animal feed. Market initiatives, setbacks, and the needs of the market are discussed in this report. The comparisons, usage, and advantages and disadvantages of different enzymes types are also discussed.

A detailed analysis of the structure of the enzymes industry has been conducted. Revenues are broken down by global region. Sales figures are estimated for the 5-year period of 2010 through 2015.

Applications for industrial enzymes are also discussed separately in the report, with an emphasis on the usage of technical enzymes and food and beverage enzymes. The report also covers significant patents and their number in each category.

REASONS FOR DOING THIS STUDY

Extensive research on the biochemistry of small organisms has revealed that specific enzymes are responsible for the production of brewing, baking, and milk and dairy products. Microorganisms used in the past have now been replaced by purified enzymes. Modern industries have begun to explore the advantages of enzymes. This has led to the growing market for industrial enzymes.

Research and development (R&D) spending, along with increasing competition, patent expiries, and new technologies are taking the global market for industrial enzymes in a new direction. Although the industry did see a setback in 2009 due to the economic downturn, the new advancements and the need for cost reductions are influencing market growth. This study looks at most of the systems affected by these factors.
Acquisition strategies and collaborations by companies are also covered in this report. This study also discusses the strength and weaknesses of each type of technology in light of the new technologies, growing competition, and changing customer needs.

INTENDED AUDIENCE

This study contributes to the areas of market growth in food and beverages, animal feed, detergents, leather, and other technical enzyme manufacturers and users. Chemical, biochemical and biotechnical companies industries, and research institutes will find this study to be of interest.

SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The scope of this study encompasses industrial enzymes, biotechnical, chemical, and biotechnology markets. BCC analyzes each market and its applications, regulatory environment, technology involved, market projections, and market share. Technological issues include the latest trends and developments.

METHODOLOGY

Both primary and secondary research methodologies were used in preparing this study. BCC conducted a comprehensive literature search, which included technical newsletters and journals, and many other sources. Data were collected through interviews and correspondence with various chemical, biotechnical, and food and beverage technical experts. Projections are based on estimates such as the current number of end users, potential end users, mergers and acquisitions, and market trends.

INFORMATION SOURCES

Many companies within the industry were surveyed to obtain data for this study. Included were manufacturers and end users of enzymes in the chemical, biotechnology, food and beverage, leather, and detergent industries. Data were gathered from various industry sources. BCC spoke with officials within the industry, consulted newsletters, company literature, product literature, and a host of technical articles, journals, indexes, and abstracts. Exhaustive investigations of databases by key terminology were completed. In addition, data were compiled from current financial, trade, and government sources.

Table of Contents

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
STUDY OBJECTIVES
REASONS FOR DOING THIS STUDY
INTENDED AUDIENCE
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
METHODOLOGY
INFORMATION SOURCES
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
RELATED BCC RESEARCH REPORTS
BCC ONLINE SERVICES
DISCLAIMER
CHAPTER TWO: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SUMMARY TABLE GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES MARKET, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
SUMMARY FIGURE GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES MARKET, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
CHAPTER THREE: OVERVIEW
DEFINITIONS
ENZYME
COENZYME
PROSTHETIC GROUP
ACTIVE SITE
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ENZYMES
CHEMICAL NATURE OF ENZYMES
ENZYME NOMENCLATURE
HISTORY OF ENZYMES
TABLE 1 HISTORY OF ENZYMES
FACTORS AFFECTING THE PERFORMANCE OF ENZYMES
TEMPERATURE
PH
IONS
CONCENTRATION
MECHANISM OF ENZYME ACTION
ENZYME SPECIFICITY
PRODUCTION OF ENZYMES
TABLE 2 PROTEIN ENGINEERED COMMERCIAL ENZYMES
TABLE 3 EXAMPLES OF GENETICALLY ENGINEERED ENZYMES
GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS IN ENZYME MANUFACTURING
TABLE 4 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ENZYMES
CHAPTER FOUR: CLASSIFICATION OF ENZYMES
CLASSIFICATION BASED ON STRUCTURE AND PARTS
CLASSIFICATION BASED ON CHEMICAL REACTION THE ENZYMES CATALYZE
OXIDOREDUCTASES
TRANSFERASES
HYDROLASES
LYASES
ISOMERASES
LIGASES OR SYNTHETASES
TABLE 5 TYPES OF ENZYMES AND REACTIONS THEY CATALYZE
CLASSIFICATION OF ENZYMES BASED ON THEIR APPLICATION
TABLE 6 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL AND MEDICAL ENZYMES
INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES
Advantages/Benefits of Industrial Enzymes
TABLE 7 COMMONLY USED INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES
Detergent Enzymes
TABLE 8 COMMONLY USED ENZYMES IN DETERGENTS
Technical Enzymes
Enzymes in the Textile Industry
Enzymes in the Pulp and Paper Industry
Enzymes in the Leather Industry
TABLE 9 ENZYMES USED IN VARIOUS PROCESSES OF LEATHER MANUFACTURING
Enzymes in the Food and Beverage Industry
Enzymes in the Starch and Sugar Industry
Enzymes in the Baking Industry
TABLE 10 ENZYMES USED IN THE BAKING INDUSTRY
Enzymes in the Dairy Industry
Enzymes in the Brewing Industry
Enzymes in the Fruit Juice Industry
Enzymes in the Tea and Coffee Industry
Enzymes in the Alcohol Industry
Enzymes in the Animal Feed Industry
TABLE 11 ENZYMES USED IN ANIMAL FEED
CHAPTER FIVE: REGULATORY ASPECTS
GRAS NOTICES
TABLE 12 GRAS NOTICES, 2006-2010 (JULY)
NEW THERAPEUTIC ENZYME APPROVALS
TABLE 13 NEW APPROVALS FOR THERAPEUTIC ENZYMES
OTHER APPROVALS
CHAPTER SIX: INDUSTRY STRUCTURE
MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS OF ENZYMES

TABLE 14 LEADING MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS OF DETERGENT ENZYMES

TABLE 15 LEADING MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIERS OF TECHNICAL ENZYMES
TABLE 16 LEADING MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIERS OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES
TABLE 17 LEADING MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIERS OF ANIMAL FEED ENZYMES
MARKET SHARES OF INDUSTRY LEADERS
DETERGENT ENZYMES
TABLE 18 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF DETERGENT ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
FIGURE 1 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF DETERGENT ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
TECHNICAL ENZYMES
TABLE 19 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF TECHNICAL ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
FIGURE 2 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF TECHNICAL ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES
TABLE 20 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
FIGURE 3 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
ANIMAL FEED ENZYMES
TABLE 21 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF ANIMAL FEED ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
FIGURE 4 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF ANIMAL FEED ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
NEW DEVELOPMENTS
GENENCOR

TABLE 22 NEW DEVELOPMENTS BY GENENCOR

NOVOZYMES
TABLE 23 NEW DEVELOPMENTS BY NOVOZYMES
AB ENZYMES
TABLE 24 NEW DEVELOPMENTS BY AB ENZYMES
VERENIUM CORP.
TABLE 25 NEW DEVELOPMENTS BY AB VERENIUM CORP.
OTHERS
TABLE 26 NEW DEVELOPMENTS BY AB VERENIUM CORP.
CHAPTER SEVEN: MARKET ANALYSIS
TABLE 27 GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES MARKET, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 5 GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES MARKET, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
DETERGENT ENZYMES
TABLE 28 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ENZYMATIC AND NONENZYMATIC DETERGENTS
MARKET OVERVIEW
MARKET REVENUE
TABLE 29 GLOBAL MARKET FOR DETERGENT ENZYMES BY REGION, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 6 GLOBAL MARKET FOR DETERGENT ENZYMES BY REGION, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TECHNICAL ENZYMES
MARKET OVERVIEW
MARKET REVENUE
TABLE 30 GLOBAL MARKET FOR TECHNICAL ENZYMES BY REGION, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 7 GLOBAL MARKET FOR TECHNICAL ENZYMES BY REGION, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES
MARKET OVERVIEW
MARKET REVENUE
TABLE 31 GLOBAL MARKET FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES BY REGION THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 8 GLOBAL MARKET FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES BY REGION, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
ANIMAL FEED
MARKET OVERVIEW
MARKET REVENUE
TABLE 32 GLOBAL MARKET FOR FEED ENZYMES BY REGION, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 9 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ANIMAL FEED ENZYMES BY REGION, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
GLOBAL REGIONAL MARKET SHARES
TABLE 33 GLOBAL ENZYME MARKET SHARES BY REGION, 2009 (%)
FIGURE 10 GLOBAL ENZYME MARKET SHARES BY REGION, 2009 (%)
MARKET BY APPLICATION
APPLICATIONS FOR DETERGENT ENZYMES
APPLICATIONS FOR TECHNICAL ENZYMES
Textile Enzymes
Market Overview and Revenue
TABLE 34 GLOBAL MARKET FOR TEXTILE ENZYMES, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 11 GLOBAL MARKET FOR TEXTILE ENZYMES, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
Pulp and Paper Industry
Market Overview and Revenue

TABLE 35 GLOBAL MARKET FOR PULP AND PAPER ENZYMES, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)

FIGURE 12 GLOBAL MARKET FOR PULP AND PAPER ENZYMES, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
Bioethanol
Market Overview and Revenue

TABLE 36 GLOBAL MARKET FOR BIOETHANOL ENZYMES, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)

FIGURE 13 GLOBAL MARKET FOR BIOETHANOL ENZYMES, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
Leather Enzymes
Market Overview and Revenue
TABLE 37 GLOBAL MARKET FOR LEATHER ENZYMES, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 14 GLOBAL MARKET FOR LEATHER ENZYMES, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
Total Market Revenues for Technical Enzymes by Application
TABLE 38 GLOBAL REVENUE FOR TECHNICAL ENZYMES IN VARIOUS APPLICATION SEGMENTS, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 15 GLOBAL REVENUES FOR TECHNICAL ENZYMES IN VARIOUS APPLICATION SEGMENTS, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
ENZYMES IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY
Sugar Syrups or Sweeteners
Market Overview and Revenue
TABLE 39 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN SUGAR SYRUPS AND SWEETNERS, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 16 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN SUGAR SYRUPS AND SWEETNERS, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
Baking Industry
Market Overview and Revenue
TABLE 40 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE BAKING SEGMENT, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 17 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE BAKING SEGMENT, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
Brewing Enzymes
Market Overview and Revenue
TABLE 41 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE BREWING SEGMENT, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 18 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN BREWING SEGMENT, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
Milk and Dairy Enzymes
Market Overview and Revenue
TABLE 42 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE MILK AND DAIRY SEGMENT, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 19 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE MILK AND DAIRY SEGMENT, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
Beverages
Market Overview and Revenue
TABLE 43 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE BEVERAGE SEGMENT, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 20 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE BEVERAGE SEGMENT, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
Others
Market Overview and Revenue
TABLE 44 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE OTHERS CATEGORY, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 21 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE OTHERS CATEGORY, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
Total Market Revenue for Food and Beverage Enzymes by Application
TABLE 45 GLOBAL REVENUE FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES IN VARIOUS APPLICATION SEGMENTS, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 22 GLOBAL REVENUE FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES IN VARIOUS APPLICATION SEGMENTS, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
ANIMAL FEED ENZYMES
MARKET SHARES OF TECHNICAL ENZYMES APPLICATIONS

TABLE 46 GLOBAL TECHNICAL ENZYMES BY APPLICATION, 2009 (%)

FIGURE 23 GLOBAL TECHNICAL ENZYME MARKET SHARES, BY APPLICATION, 2009 (%)
MARKET SHARES OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES APPLICATIONS
TABLE 47 GLOBAL FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES BY APPLICATION, 2009 (%)
FIGURE 24 GLOBAL FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES MARKET SHARES, BY APPLICATION, 2009 (%)
CHAPTER EIGHT: PATENT ANALYSIS
PATENTS BY YEAR
TABLE 48 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY YEAR, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
FIGURE 25 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY YEAR, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
FIGURE 26 NUMBER OF PATENTS BY YEAR, 2006-2010 (%)
PATENTS BY TYPE
TABLE 49 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY TYPE, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
FIGURE 27 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY TYPE, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
PATENTS BY APPLICATION
TABLE 50 U.S. PATENTS ON TECHNICAL ENZYMES BY APPLICATION, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
FIGURE 28 U.S. PATENTS ON TECHNICAL ENZYMES BY APPLICATION, 2006-2010 (NO.)
TABLE 51 U.S. PATENTS ON FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES BY APPLICATION, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
FIGURE 29 U.S. PATENTS ON FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES BY APPLICATION, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
PATENTS BY COMPANY

TABLE 52 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY COMPANY, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)

FIGURE 30 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY COMPANY, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
PATENTS BY COUNTRY

TABLE 53 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY COUNTRY, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)

FIGURE 31 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY COUNTRY, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
TABLE 54 PATENT SHARES OF INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY COUNTRY, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NUMBER/%)
FIGURE 32 U.S. PATENT SHARES OF INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY COUNTRY, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (%)
PATENTS BY ASSIGNEE
TABLE 55 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY ASSIGNEE TYPE, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
FIGURE 33 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY ASSIGNEE, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
CHAPTER NINE: CURRENT SITUATION
FACTORS AFFECTING THE INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES MARKET
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
COST REDUCTION
INNOVATIVE USE OF ENZYMES
CONTINUED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
SIGNIFICANT FUNDING FOR RESEARCH ON BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION
ADVANTAGEOUS PROFILE OF ENZYMES
MANUFACTURERS’ STRATEGIES
FUTURE OF THE INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES MARKET
CHAPTER TEN: COMPANY PROFILES
AB ENZYMES
ADVANCED ENZYME TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
AMANO ENZYME, INC.
AUM ENZYMES
BASF CORP.
BIOCATALYSTS, LTD.
BIORESOURCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CARGILL TEXTURIZING SOLUTIONS
CHR. HANSEN
DANISCO A/S
DIREVO INDUSTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY GMBH
DSM FOOD SPECIALTIES
DYADIC INTERNATIONAL
ENZYMATIC DEINKING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
ENZYME SOLUTIONS, INC.
HAYASHIBARA INTERNATIONAL
MAPS ENZYMES, LTD.
NOVOZYMES A/S
SPECIALTY ENZYMES & BIOTECHNOLOGIES CO.
VERENIUM CORP.
APPENDIX: ABBREVIATIONS
LIST OF TABLES
SUMMARY TABLE GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES MARKET,
THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 1 HISTORY OF ENZYMES
TABLE 2 PROTEIN ENGINEERED COMMERCIAL ENZYMES
TABLE 3 EXAMPLES OF GENETICALLY ENGINEERED ENZYMES
TABLE 4 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ENZYMES
TABLE 5 TYPES OF ENZYMES AND REACTIONS THEY CATALYZE
TABLE 6 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL AND MEDICAL ENZYMES
TABLE 7 COMMONLY USED INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES
TABLE 8 COMMONLY USED ENZYMES IN DETERGENTS
TABLE 9 ENZYMES USED IN VARIOUS PROCESSES OF LEATHER MANUFACTURING
TABLE 10 ENZYMES USED IN THE BAKING INDUSTRY
TABLE 11 ENZYMES USED IN ANIMAL FEED
TABLE 12 GRAS NOTICES, 2006-2010 (JULY)
TABLE 13 NEW APPROVALS FOR THERAPEUTIC ENZYMES
TABLE 14 LEADING MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS OF DETERGENT ENZYMES
TABLE 15 LEADING MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIERS OF TECHNICAL ENZYMES
TABLE 16 LEADING MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIERS OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES
TABLE 17 LEADING MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIERS OF ANIMAL FEED ENZYMES
TABLE 18 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF DETERGENT ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
TABLE 19 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF TECHNICAL ENZYME ANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
TABLE 20 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
TABLE 21 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF ANIMAL FEED ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
TABLE 22 NEW DEVELOPMENTS BY GENENCOR
TABLE 23 NEW DEVELOPMENTS BY NOVOZYMES
TABLE 24 NEW DEVELOPMENTS BY AB ENZYMES
TABLE 25 NEW DEVELOPMENTS BY AB VERENIUM CORP.
TABLE 26 NEW DEVELOPMENTS BY AB VERENIUM CORP.
TABLE 27 GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES MARKET, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 28 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ENZYMATIC AND NONENZYMATIC DETERGENTS
TABLE 29 GLOBAL MARKET FOR DETERGENT ENZYMES BY REGION, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 30 GLOBAL MARKET FOR TECHNICAL ENZYMES BY REGION, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 31 GLOBAL MARKET FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES BY REGION THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 32 GLOBAL MARKET FOR FEED ENZYMES BY REGION, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 33 GLOBAL ENZYME MARKET SHARES BY REGION, 2009 (%)
TABLE 34 GLOBAL MARKET FOR TEXTILE ENZYMES, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 35 GLOBAL MARKET FOR PULP AND PAPER ENZYMES, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 36 GLOBAL MARKET FOR BIOETHANOL ENZYMES, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 37 GLOBAL MARKET FOR LEATHER ENZYMES, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 38 GLOBAL REVENUE FOR TECHNICAL ENZYMES IN VARIOUS APPLICATION SEGMENTS, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 39 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN SUGAR SYRUPS AND SWEETNERS, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 40 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE BAKING SEGMENT, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 41 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE BREWING SEGMENT, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 42 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE MILK AND DAIRY SEGMENT, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 43 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE BEVERAGE SEGMENT, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 44 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE OTHERS CATEGORY, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 45 GLOBAL REVENUE FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES IN VARIOUS APPLICATION SEGMENTS, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
TABLE 46 GLOBAL TECHNICAL ENZYMES BY APPLICATION, 2009 (%)
TABLE 47 GLOBAL FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES BY APPLICATION, 2009 (%)
TABLE 48 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY YEAR, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
TABLE 49 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY TYPE, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
TABLE 50 U.S. PATENTS ON TECHNICAL ENZYMES BY APPLICATION, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
TABLE 51 U.S. PATENTS ON FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES BY APPLICATION, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
TABLE 52 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY COMPANY, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
TABLE 53 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY COUNTRY, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
TABLE 54 PATENT SHARES OF INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY COUNTRY, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NUMBER/%)
TABLE 55 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY ASSIGNEE TYPE, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
LIST OF FIGURES
SUMMARY FIGURE GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES MARKET, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 1 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF DETERGENT ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
FIGURE 2 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF TECHNICAL ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
FIGURE 3 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
FIGURE 4 GLOBAL MARKET SHARES OF ANIMAL FEED ENZYME MANUFACTURERS, 2009 (%)
FIGURE 5 GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES MARKET, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 6 GLOBAL MARKET FOR DETERGENT ENZYMES BY REGION, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 7 GLOBAL MARKET FOR TECHNICAL ENZYMES BY REGION, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 8 GLOBAL MARKET FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES BY REGION, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 9 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ANIMAL FEED ENZYMES BY REGION, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 10 GLOBAL ENZYME MARKET SHARES BY REGION, 2009 (%)
FIGURE 11 GLOBAL MARKET FOR TEXTILE ENZYMES, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 12 GLOBAL MARKET FOR PULP AND PAPER ENZYMES, THROUGH 2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 13 GLOBAL MARKET FOR BIOETHANOL ENZYMES, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 14 GLOBAL MARKET FOR LEATHER ENZYMES, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 15 GLOBAL REVENUES FOR TECHNICAL ENZYMES IN VARIOUS APPLICATION SEGMENTS, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 16 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN SUGAR SYRUPS AND SWEETNERS, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 17 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE BAKING SEGMENT, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 18 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN BREWING SEGMENT, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 19 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE MILK AND DAIRY SEGMENT, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 20 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE BEVERAGE SEGMENT, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 21 GLOBAL MARKET FOR ENZYMES IN THE OTHERS CATEGORY, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 22 GLOBAL REVENUE FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES IN VARIOUS APPLICATION SEGMENTS, 2008-2015 ($ MILLIONS)
FIGURE 23 GLOBAL TECHNICAL ENZYME MARKET SHARES, BY APPLICATION, 2009 (%)
FIGURE 24 GLOBAL FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES MARKET SHARES, BY APPLICATION, 2009 (%)
FIGURE 25 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY YEAR, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
FIGURE 26 NUMBER OF PATENTS BY YEAR, 2006-2010 (%)
FIGURE 27 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY TYPE, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
FIGURE 28 U.S. PATENTS ON TECHNICAL ENZYMES BY APPLICATION, 2006-2010 (NO.)
FIGURE 29 U.S. PATENTS ON FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENZYMES BY APPLICATION, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
FIGURE 30 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY COMPANY, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
FIGURE 31 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY COUNTRY, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)
FIGURE 32 U.S. PATENT SHARES OF INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY COUNTRY, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (%)
FIGURE 33 U.S. PATENTS ON INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES BY ASSIGNEE, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 2010 (NO.)

Enzymes in Industrial Applications: Global Markets
 
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Read More
Posted by a on
categories: |


China waterproof construction material manufacturing industry, 2011

China waterproof construction material manufacturing Industry, 2011 is valuable for anyone who wants to invest in the waterproof construction material manufacturing industry, to get Chinese investments; to import into China or export from China, to build factories and take advantage of lower costs in China, to partner with one of the key Chinese corporations, to get market shares as China is boosting its domestic needs; to forecast the future of the world economy as China is leading the way; or to compete in the segment. The report provides in-depth analysis and detailed insight into the waterproof construction material manufacturing industry, market drivers, key enterprises and their strategies, as well as technologies and investment status, risks and trends.

Data sources: Governmental statistics organizations, market research (monitoring) centers, industry associations and institutions, import and export statistics organizations, and others.
This report is divided into 9 parts 19 chapters as follow:

Part 1 Industry Overview
1 Industry definition and development overview
2 Industry macroscopic environment and its influence analysis
3 Industry international market analysis
4 Industry domestic market analysis
Part 2 Basic indices
5 Analysis of the industry’s scale and condition: 2006-2010
6 Status analysis of gross assets analysis: 2006-2010
Part 3 Economic operation
7 Analysis of gross industrial output: 2006-2010
8 Industry sales income analysis: 2006-2010
9 Industry gross profit analysis
10 Industry import/export analysis in 2010
Part 4 Competition landscape
11 Industry competition landscape analysis
12 Industry key enterprises’ competitive power comparison (top 20)
Part 5 Key enterprises
13 Comparative analysis of the economic indicators of the industry’s key enterprises
Part 6 Business strategy
14. Development bottlenecks and coping strategies in Industry
15 Enterprise development strategy analysis and recommendations in Industry
Part 7 Market investment
16 Comparison and analysis of investment activity coefficient and rate of return on investment in Industry
17 Industry investment environment and risks analysis
Part 8 Technology
18 Status and trends of the newest technology applications in Industry
Part 9 Developments and trends
19 Development trends and operation capacity forecast for 2011-2015
There are more than 150 figures and tables in the report.
Report format: PDF
Knowledge is power. If you want to invest in, import into/from, partner with, or compete against any of the companies in this field, then China waterproof construction material manufacturing Industry, 2011 is required reading.
Part 1 Industry Overview
1 Industry definition and development overview
1.1 Definition of the industry and its core products
1.2 Industry main characteristics and development history
2 Industry macroscopic environment and its influence analysis
2.1 Current macroeconomic developments and trends
2.2 Industry newest policy and related laws and rules
2.3 Upstream, downstream industry development status
3 Industry international market analysis
3.1 International market development status
3.2 Key countries and regions development levels
3.3 International market movement and development trend analysis
4 Industry domestic market analysis
4.1 Domestic market development status
4.2 Trends in the domestic market
4.3 Sub-industry development status (or main industry development status)
Part 2 Basic indices
5 Analysis of the industry’s scale and condition: 2006-2010
5.1 Number of enterprises in the industry: 2006-2010
5.2 Number of loss-making enterprises in the industry: 2006-2010
5.3 Total loss of the industry: 2006-2010
5.4 Number of personnel employed by the industry: 2006-2010
6 Status analysis of gross assets analysis: 2006-2010
6.1 Status and analysis of gross assets: 2006-2010
6.2 Status and analysis of fixed assets: 2006-2010
6.3 Gross floating asset analysis: 2006-2010
Part 3 Economic operation
7 Analysis of gross industrial output: 2006-2010
7.1 Industry gross output value: 2006-2010
7.2 Distribution of gross industrial output value by geographic area: 2010
7.3 Comparison of the top 20 enterprises (based on highest gross output value)
8 Industry sales income analysis: 2006-2010
8.1 Sales income analysis in 2006-2010
8.2 Regional distribution status of sales income in 2010
8.3 Comparison of the top 20 enterprises (based on highest gross sales revenue) in 2010
9 Industry gross profit analysis
9.1 Gross profit analysis: 2006-2010
9.2 Regional distribution status of gross profit in 2010
9.3 Comparison of the top 20 enterprises (based on highest gross profit) in 2010
10 Industry import/export analysis in 2010
10.1 Import/export monthly status in 2010
10.2 Distribution of import/export Customs and countries in 2010
10.3 Distribution of import/export product categories in 2010
Part 4 Competition landscape
11 Industry competition landscape analysis
11.1 Regional market competition landscape
11.2 Comparison of enterprise’s market share (top 20)
12 Industry key enterprises’ competitive power comparison (top 20)
12.1 Comparison analysis of key enterprises’ total assets
12.2 Comparison analysis of key enterprises’ employees
12.3 Comparison analysis of key enterprises’ yearly revenue
12.4 Comparison analysis of key enterprises’ export turnover value
12.5 Comparison analysis of key enterprises’ total profit
12.6 Comparison analysis and recommendations on key enterprises’ overall competitive power
Part 5 Key enterprises
13 Comparative analysis of the economic indicators of the industry’s key enterprises
13.1 Geographical distribution
13.2 Competition status analysis of company AAAAA
A Enterprise’ basic information
B Enterprise’ balance sheet analysis
C Enterprise’ business operation analysis
D Enterprise’ operating expense and cost analysis
E Enterprise’ industrial intermediate inputs and cash flow analysis
F Enterprise’ non-operating expenses analysis
……
13.21 Competition status analysis of company TTTTT
A Enterprise’ basic information
B Enterprise’ balance sheet analysis
C Enterprise’ business operation analysis
D Enterprise’ operating expense and cost analysis
E Enterprise’ industrial intermediate inputs and cash flow analysis
F Enterprise’ non-operating expenses analysis
Part 6 Business strategy
14. Development bottlenecks and coping strategies in Industry
14.1 Development bottlenecks
14.2 Coping strategies
15 Enterprise development strategy analysis and recommendations in Industry
15.1 Enterprise business strategy analysis and recommendations
15.2 Marketing strategy, analysis, and recommendations
Part 7 Market investment
16 Comparison and analysis of investment activity coefficient and rate of return on investment in Industry
16.1 Industry activity coefficient comparison and analysis
16.2 Comparison and analysis on industry rate of return on investment
17 Industry investment environment and risks analysis
17.1 Investment environment analysis
17.2 Investment risks analysis
17.3 Investment recommendations
Part 8 Technology
18 Status and trends of the newest technology applications in Industry
18.1 Status of the newest technology applications
18.2 Trends of the newest technology applications
Part 9 Developments and trends
19 Development trends and operation capacity forecast for 2011-2015
19.1 Development trends
19.2 Operation capacity forecast for 2011-2015

China Waterproof Construction Material Manufacturing Industry

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , Jib Cranes , Gantry Cranes, Goliath Cranes, Stacker Cranes

Read More
Posted by a on
categories: |