Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts

Browse the complete Report onGreece Defence and Security Report Q3 2010
Browse All Business Monitor International Market Research Reports

Greece has been rocked by serious protests in recent months as the government has embarked upon a tough austerity programme that may transform the Greek economy in the long term. While some protests have descended into riots, some with loss of life, Greece is a relatively stable and affluent society which should be able to ride out the difficulties in the medium term.
In May 2010, three people were killed in a firebomb attack as post-May Day strikes and protests took a bloody turn, the Times newspaper reported. Greece has a history of protests, which often involve semiorchestrated battles between anarchists and the police. In June, more strikes were held, including one which shut down the port at Piraeus, Athens’s main outlet to the sea, as reported by AP. However, no violence was reported and the situation appeared considerably calmer by late June, perhaps as a fullblown crisis seemed to have been averted.
In the past decade, Greece has spent EUR50bn on its military, and the armed forces budget rose every year since 2003. According to press reports, a major factor behind the substantial and rising outlay was a perception of threat from Greece’s neighbour Turkey. However, in the same period, Greco-Turkish relations have actually improved to the extent that the two countries are arguably closer than at any stage since the foundation of the Turkish Republic in the 1920s. The risk of a full-scale armed conflict between Greece and Turkey in the foreseeable future is negligible, though spikes in tension are possible. Territorial disagreements between Greece and Turkey are increasingly seen as symbolic, and very much secondary to the countries’ mutual economic interests. In summary, if the expansion of the Greek military’s budget in recent years really has been directed at Turkey, it is something of a white elephant.
However, one should also consider other factors, not least Greece’s international military commitments through NATO and the UN. Furthermore, given its strategic position on the Mediterranean, Adriatic and Aegean Seas – with scope to control the exit from the Black Sea, a good case could be made for bringing the Greek armed forces up to date, and ensuring that they are well equipped. Nonetheless, after a period of heavy investment, and with improved relations with Turkey in mind, economic prerogatives are likely to see spending cut significantly. A May 2010 report by Bloomberg suggested that the rapprochement between the two countries would give Greece the opportunity to cut back on military spending, starting with a EUR500m reduction in 2010, as the government looks to tackle the fiscal deficit. However, convincing an already restive electorate, in which the far right has a growing influence, that Turkey is no longer a threat, will be another challenge for the government. Overall, we expect expenditure of US$10.7bn in 2010, rising to just US$11.14bn in 2014, although as more details of forced government austerities come to light, we may revise this forecasts further downwards.


About Us
ReportsandReports comprises an online library of 10,000 reports, in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets, and 25 industry specific websites. Our client list boasts almost all well-known publishers of such reports across the globe. We as a third-party reseller of market research reports employ a number of marketing tools, such as press releases, email-marketing and effective search-engine optimization techniques to drive revenues for our clients. We also provide 24/7 online and offline support service to our customers.


Contact:
Ms. Sunita
7557 Rambler road,
Suite 727, Dallas, TX 75231
Tel: +1-888-989-8004
http://reportsandreports.blogspot.com/
http://reportsandreports.proarticles.co.uk/
http://reportsnreports.wordpress.com/


Original Source : Defence and Security Market
Buy Now : Market Research Report

Read More

Browse the complete Report onUnited States Consumer Electronics Report Q3 2010
Browse All Business Monitor International Market Research Reports

The US consumer electronics devices market, defined as the addressable market for computing devices, mobile handsets and AV products, is projected to be worth around US$232.9bn in 2010. This is expected to increase to US$268.1bn by 2014 at a CAGR of 3.6%, driven by premium TV sets, smartphones and notebooks.
In the first quarter of 2010, sales of consumer electronics products such as notebooks and LED-backlit TV sets grew strongly, building on a recovery signalled by solid 2009 winter holiday sales of consumer electronics products. However, consumer credit has been contracting at an unprecedented pace over the past several months, and we see this trend continuing.
Going forward, mature markets in many segments mean that growth will rely to a large extent on product innovation such as Android smartphones, and touchscreen handsets as well as 3D and internet-enabled and 3DTV sets.
Computers
BMI forecasts US PC sales of US$116.6bn in 2010. CAGR for the 2010-2014 period will be around 4.6%, but there will be growth areas in multimedia and entertainment notebooks. US PC sales grew strongly in Q110, with unit sales estimated by BMI at above 17mn units. BMI estimated that the market is on course for total PC sales of 77mn in 2010. Netbooks and notebooks remain the largest product category but face competition from the smartphones of Palm, RIM, Apple and other vendors as well as tablet notebooks, spearheaded by Apple’s iPad. Computers 2009-2010 Source: BMI
AV
The US domestic video, audio and gaming device market is projected at US$66.9bn in 2010. Video applications will account for around 80% of demand during the 2010-2014 forecast period, with growth areas linked to new technologies such as LED TV sets, 3DTV and Blu-ray. Vendors will focus on product innovation, with drivers including improved display quality and wider screens, as well as features such as internet connectivity. Sales of 3DTV sets in the United State markets could exceed 3mn units in 2010, or around 10% of the expected LCD TV market.
Mobile Handsets
Total US market handset sales are expected to grow at a CAGR of about 1.5% to 144mn units in 2014. With an increasingly saturated US market, handset revenues will be driven by emerging product areas such as smartphones, touchscreen phones and HD camera phones. Smartphones will be a key growth area and currently account for around 20% of volume sales in the US market. As new long-term evolution (LTE) networks begin to come online from 2010, this should boost replacement handset purchases.


About Us
ReportsandReports comprises an online library of 10,000 reports, in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets, and 25 industry specific websites. Our client list boasts almost all well-known publishers of such reports across the globe. We as a third-party reseller of market research reports employ a number of marketing tools, such as press releases, email-marketing and effective search-engine optimization techniques to drive revenues for our clients. We also provide 24/7 online and offline support service to our customers.


Contact:
Ms. Sunita
7557 Rambler road,
Suite 727, Dallas, TX 75231
Tel: +1-888-989-8004
http://reportsandreports.blogspot.com/
http://reportsandreports.proarticles.co.uk/
http://reportsnreports.wordpress.com/

Original Source : Consumer Electronics Market
Buy Now : Market Research Report

Read More

Browse the complete Report onUnited States Freight Transport Report Q3 2010
Browse All Business Monitor International Market Research Reports
Having been ravaged by 2009's global economic downturn, a recovering US economy has helped the US freight transport sector back on its feet in 2010, with most transport modes registering steady pick-ups in volumes in the first half of the year. The American Trucking Association (ATA)'s For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index rose by 9.4% year-on-year (y-o-y) in April 2010 on a seasonally-adjusted basis, representing the largest gain recorded by the index since January 2005 and the fifth consecutive month of y-o-y increases. April's rise meant that US truck tonnage volumes had grown by 6% y-o-y in 2010. Meanwhile, according to figures provided by the Port Authority of New York/ New Jersey, freight volumes handled at JFK Airport totalled 115,000 tonnes in April, up by 31.6% y-o-y from the facility's 2009 nadir, though they fell by 5.1% on a month-on-month (m-o-m) basis.
Things are also looking more positive from a company perspective, and freight transport operators have taken the rebound in economic activity as a cue to expand capacity and chase potential mergers and acquisitions. There is a sense that not all firms are yet out of the woods, however, and despite an improving short-term outlook a number of challenges remain. Indeed, in Q110, the largest US trucking line YRC Worldwide registered a net loss of US$274mn in Q110 and over the same period, the company's revenue was US$1.1bn, down 29% y-o-y and 7% q-o-q. The company's sales were badly affected by harsh weather and shipper concern over its future with industry observers wary that the trucker may be facing a further liquidity squeeze after only narrowly escaping bankruptcy in the final weeks of 2009.
Though the prevailing mood for the sector has so far been positive in 2010, continued uncertainty surrounding the strength and longetivity of the US economic recovery and a nervous consumer and manufacturing sector mean that operators are unlikely to rest on their laurels. With these concerns firmly in mind, for most transport modes BMI is forecasting recoveries which are moderate rather than remarkable and expects the rate of growth for most sub-sectors to relent somewhat in 2011 as the country's economy loses some of its early momentum.
The US port sector is expected to show one of the industry's stronger growth patterns in 2010 with the country's two largest west and Gulf Coast terminals, the port of Los Angeles (LA) and the Port of Houston, forecast to register respective increases of 6.7% and 5.3% in their total tonnage throughput after no growth, and in LA's case an 18.4% contraction in handling in 2009. At the port of New York/ New Jersey, however, the country's largest east coast facility, the rate of increase over 2010 is forecast to be minimal at just 0.8% y-o-y.
The US air freight sector has also enjoyed strong growth metrics and is on course for a sizeable rebound in 2010 after 2009's 10.2% contraction in freight tonne-km flown. BMI forecasts a reverse of 8.3% with carriers projected to fly 21.6bn freight tonne-km.
Road and rail freight, meanwhile, are expected to experience a more moderate rate of growth in keeping with the relatively narrow contraction in volumes seen in 2009. BMI forecasts US rail freight volumes to increase by 4.5% y-o-y to 2.49trn freight tonne-km after a fall of 5.5% in 2009. Road freight, having contracted by 3.2% in 2009 is predicted to increase by 2.9% in 2010 to 1.99trn freight tonne-km. The US's in-land waterways should display an ever more slender growth pattern with total volumes carried predicted to increase by 0.5% to 646.99bn freight tonne-km after contracting by 0.7% in 2009. The recovery in the US freight transport sector is largely consistent with the projected uptick in the country's total trade volumes which in 2009 decreased by 11.9% in real terms. In 2010 we forecast the country's total trade to grow by 7.8% with imports and exports set to increase by 7.7% and 7.9% respectively.
About Us
ReportsandReports comprises an online library of 10,000 reports, in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets, and 25 industry specific websites. Our client list boasts almost all well-known publishers of such reports across the globe. We as a third-party reseller of market research reports employ a number of marketing tools, such as press releases, email-marketing and effective search-engine optimization techniques to drive revenues for our clients. We also provide 24/7 online and offline support service to our customers.
Contact:
Ms. Sunita
7557 Rambler road,
Suite 727, Dallas, TX 75231
Tel: +1-888-989-8004
http://reportsandreports.blogspot.com/
http://reportsandreports.proarticles.co.uk/
http://reportsnreports.wordpress.com/

Original Source : United States Freight Transport Market
Buy Now : Market Research Report

Read More

Browse the complete Report onUnited States Defence and Security Report Q3 2010
Browse All Business Monitor International Market Research Reports

General Stanley McChrystal’s abrupt dismissal as Commander of US Forces Afghanistan (USFOR-A) has complicated matters in the near-term for the US campaign in the country. McChrystal’s dismissal (officially a resignation) became a political necessity after his derogatory comments regarding civilian government officials were published, but this made his removal no less inconvenient for Obama. The view that victory in Afghanistan is insurmountable grew stronger on the back of the unanticipated change in leadership.
As a seasoned military leader, General David Petraeus’ selection as the replacement for McChyrstal was a natural choice for Obama. The general was formerly the US Central Command (Centcom) commander and as such had a hand in Obama’s reworked policy on the Afghan campaign, which was revealed in late- 2009. However, Petraeus has been known to be critical of a drawdown of US forces from July 2011. Petraeus’ perceived scepticism was the focus, as his candidacy was questioned during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing in late-June 2010. The general has openly supported the pullout timeline, although he equivocally emphasised that a satisfactory balance must be found between providing a sense of urgency for US and allied forces and emboldening counter-insurgency forces by stating a withdrawal deadline.
Despite the uncertainty, BMI expects total military expenditure in the coming years – excepting supplemental requests – to decline to levels not seen since 2007. After the drawdown of US troops in Afghanistan, expenditure should ease to US$616bn in 2012, down from US$708bn in 2011. However, BMI expects spending to increase in the subsequent two years, although it will not take a greater share of GDP. Expenditure in 2013 should reach US$632bn, 3.45% of GDP, and US$648bn by 2014, representing 3.35% of GDP.
In one of the most important developments for the US defence industry, Defence Secretary Robert Gates said in April 2010 that the country’s export controls ought to be overhauled. Gates said that the controls were more suited to the Cold War environment and now served only to constrain supplies to allies while easing market penetration by foreign defence companies. The notoriously cumbersome International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) spreads the export process over a number of agencies goods lists. The result is a far more opaque and laborious trade environment than exists in comparable countries. Under pressure from the domestic defence industry as well as foreign governments, Gates built on efforts by the previous two administrations by announcing the most comprehensive ITAR reform programme yet. The reform overhauls the current system of controls by creating a single new agency to interpret and implement the regulations. Moreover, one new list will replace the existing multiple lists of defence items controlled by ITAR. This streamlining is no less dependent on Congressional cooperation, however.


About Us
ReportsandReports comprises an online library of 10,000 reports, in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets, and 25 industry specific websites. Our client list boasts almost all well-known publishers of such reports across the globe. We as a third-party reseller of market research reports employ a number of marketing tools, such as press releases, email-marketing and effective search-engine optimization techniques to drive revenues for our clients. We also provide 24/7 online and offline support service to our customers.

Contact:
Ms. Sunita
7557 Rambler road,
Suite 727, Dallas, TX 75231
Tel: +1-888-989-8004
http://reportsandreports.blogspot.com/
http://reportsandreports.proarticles.co.uk/
http://reportsnreports.wordpress.com/

Original Source : Defence and Security Market
Buy Now : Market Research Report

Read More

Browse the complete Report onUnited States Infrastructure Report Q3 2010
Browse All Business Monitor International Market Research Reports

In 2010, the US construction industry is forecast to emerge from a five-year decline, which reached its trough in 2009 at -9.9% year-on-year (y-o-y). Bolstered by the stimulus package, which is due to focus on projects in its second year, the industry is forecast to grow by 1.6% in 2010. Although this indicates only minimal growth, this is due to the influence of the still stagnant residential construction sector on the construction industry value. In turn, infrastructure, as a component of construction industry value, is forecast to outperform the sector as a whole, with 2.8% y-o-y growth anticipated for 2010.
- Construction industry value growth is to peak in 2011, as the majority of stimulus funding for projects is due to be disbursed in late 2010 and early 2011.
- Infrastructure is to outperform construction industry over the forecast period.
- Increasing private sector participation presents upside potential beyond 2011.
The US construction industry contracted by 9.9% y-o-y in 2009, which although substantial, was no great shock, being largely in line with BMI’s view for the industry. The figure concluded a five-year contraction in the industry, which has only posted real growth twice in the last nine years, and even then this was flat growth. This historic data illustrates what has been all too obvious on the ground: investment in the sector has been poor. This led the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) to assign US’ infrastructure a D grade, defined as ‘poor’, in March 2009. The association estimates that US$2.2trn of investment is needed in the country’s infrastructure to get it up to scratch.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) otherwise known as the stimulus bill allocated tens of billions of dollars to infrastructure and construction projects in general. While the first half of the package focused on immediate economic measures, the second half is focused on projects, which means funds will filter through to the construction sector in the second half of 2010, therefore creating the biggest impact of industry value in 2011. For this reason we believe the industry will grow at a faster rate in 2011 (2.2% y-o-y) than in 2010 (1.6% y-o-y), the reverse of BMI’s view for the economy in general. Industry value will be created in 2010, driven by some projects which are receiving funds quicker than others – such as roads, a subsector, which we believe will post 4.9% y-o-y growth for the year. However, the majority of the large allocations for the sector, such as high-speed rail and large loan guarantees for power plants, will not translate to industry value creation until 2011 and beyond.
This view is backed up by figures for US construction spending, which, for the first time in over a year posted positive growth in March and April 2010. This indicates that investment is returning to the sector, although it is still only a fragile recovery.
Another observation from the data is that infrastructure spending has been higher than construction spending over the past 18 months. This data aligns with our core view that infrastructure will outperform the construction industry in general over our forecast period. The sector is being driven by stimulus funding. Infrastructure was cited as a crucial element of the package, although in reality the around US$100bn allocated was disappointing. However, it will be enough to drive growth in the sector. A growing number of private concessions in the sector will also create industry value, picking up where the public sector, constrained by tight local budgets, has been forced to leave off. Between 2010 and 2014, infrastructure is forecast to grow by 3.4% on average per year, compared to construction as a whole, which is anticipated to grow by 1.7% on average per year.
The stimulus boost is expected to lose its impact in late 2012-2013 – as the stimulus funds recede, it will be down to the private sector to pick up support for the industry. BMI notes that there is plenty of appetite from the private sector to pick up this mantle in the US. Construction companies have been falling over themselves to tap the US public-private partnership (PPP) sector for infrastructure, drawn in by the sophisticated business environment juxtaposed with a relatively untapped market. There are concerns over whether the US will let them in; however, a growing number of PPPs in the transport sector have been moving forward. If this trend continues, there is upside potential for our longer-term forecast for the industry to sustain growth and move out of the quagmire of the past 10 years.


About Us

ReportsandReports comprises an online library of 10,000 reports, in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets, and 25 industry specific websites. Our client list boasts almost all well-known publishers of such reports across the globe. We as a third-party reseller of market research reports employ a number of marketing tools, such as press releases, email-marketing and effective search-engine optimization techniques to drive revenues for our clients. We also provide 24/7 online and offline support service to our customers.


Contact:
Ms. Sunita
7557 Rambler road,
Suite 727, Dallas, TX 75231
Tel: +1-888-989-8004
http://reportsandreports.blogspot.com/
http://reportsandreports.proarticles.co.uk/
http://reportsnreports.wordpress.com/


Original Source : Infrastructure Market
Buy Now : Market Research Report

Read More

Browse the complete Report onUnited States Information Technology Report Q3 2010
Browse All Business Monitor International Market Research Reports

Market Overview
US spending on IT products and services is forecast to reach US$629.3bn by 2014. In BMI’s core forecast scenario, US spending on IT goods and services will reach US$511.4bn in 2010 and then advance at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.5% over our five-year forecast period. BMI has upwardly revised its forecast after the first quarter of 2010 brought strong growth in US PC shipments and signs of improved confidence in some IT-spending verticals.
A major IT services demand driver will be organisations looking for help to utilise efficiencies from cloud computing models such as software-as-a-service (SaaS) and infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS).
Other key market drivers are expected to include:
  • Growing fixed and mobile broadband penetration
  • Product innovation such as tablet notebooks, e-readers and feature-rich netbooks
  • Technology innovation such as GPS and services
  • Business model innovations such as virtualisation
  • Economic recovery
Businesses are likely to remain cautious in 2010, but upgrade cycles should accelerate in the second half of the year, boosted by sales of Windows 7. The recession may have had a lasting impact on the IT market by creating the conditions for the popularity of low-cost netbooks and notebooks and encouraging consideration of new IT delivery models such as SaaS. In the light of these and other changes, major vendors have also adjusted their competitive strategies.
Industry Developments
In August 2009 the federal government reported on its 2009 calendar year IT spending. In full-year 2009, total IT spending including all federal IT investment was measured at US$74.2bn, up 1.99% on the previous year’s total of US$72.8bn. In 2010, budgeted federal IT spending is set to rise to US$78.4bn.
The Federal Government’s Stimulus Bill, which required the use of electronic healthcare records (EHS) by doctors by 2015 is expected to be a major driver of investment in this area.
Competitive Landscape
The US PC competitive landscape is dominated by two big domestic vendors, Dell and HP, which together have at least 50% of the US market. In April 2010 Apple finally launched its long-awaited iPad and achieved worldwide sales of around 2mn units within the first two months. Rival vendors such as HP and Dell have all announced or shown their own tablet products, while smartphone makers Research In Motion (RIM) and Samsung are also expected to compete in this segment.
One current driver of acquisitions in the IT services space is vendors positioning themselves to compete for the cloud computing services market. In May 2010, IBM moved to improve its position in this emerging area by purchasing California-based company Cast Iron Systems for an undisclosed sum. Meanwhile, the government remains a key vendor target. In May 2010, HP achieved one of its most recent local market successes with the win of a US$41.6mn contract from the US Department of Homeland Security. In September 2009, HP’s EDS unit won a US$30mn contract from the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to provide and maintain computing resources and mobility services.
Computer Sales
The US addressable market for PCs and accessories is estimated by BMI at US$115.5bn in 2010, with mid single-digit growth compared with 2009.
US PC sales grew strongly in Q110 and BMI estimated that the market was on course for full-year total PC sales of 77mn. In the first quarter of the year, sales were boosted by a revival of the business PC market, which is expected to gather pace in the second half of the year.
Notebooks are the fastest growing PC market segment and were on course to account for more than 60% of unit sales in 2009, while netbooks were forecast to account for around 15% of notebook sales. However, netbooks and notebooks face competition from other form factors such as smartphones from Palm, RIM, Apple and other vendors, and tablet notebooks, spearheaded by Apple’s iPad.
Software
The US software market is estimated at US$148.3bn in 2010, with single-digit growth from 2009. Software CAGR for 2010-2014 is projected at around 6.2%, as the addressable market grows to around US$188.8bn. 2010 should see a boost from systems upgrades deferred from 2009 when the economic crisis had an impact across sectors. A combination of enterprise objectives such as cost reduction and greater efficiency should combine to drive more adoption of cloud services in 2010. Drivers of demand for enterprise software include increasing operational efficiency, coordinating global supply chains and modernising logistics and warehouse functions. More investment can be expected to be in utility software and serviced-oriented architectures rather than traditionally packaged PC software.
IT Services
The US IT services market is estimated at US$227.3bn in 2010, with a sharp deceleration in spending expected compared with 2006-2008.
IT services spending is expected to record growth of 6.5% in 2010, after a sharp deceleration in 2009. Spending on IT services is quite closely correlated with GDP growth: bad news in a recession. One opportunity will be organisations looking for help with to utilise efficiencies from cloud computing such as SaaS and IaaS, as organisations in those fields look to save money on IT investments. Federal and local governments are one vertical where strong interest in cloud services is being expressed.


About Us
ReportsandReports comprises an online library of 10,000 reports, in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets, and 25 industry specific websites. Our client list boasts almost all well-known publishers of such reports across the globe. We as a third-party reseller of market research reports employ a number of marketing tools, such as press releases, email-marketing and effective search-engine optimization techniques to drive revenues for our clients. We also provide 24/7 online and offline support service to our customers.


Contact:
Ms. Sunita
7557 Rambler road,
Suite 727, Dallas, TX 75231
Tel: +1-888-989-8004
http://reportsandreports.blogspot.com/
http://reportsandreports.proarticles.co.uk/
http://reportsnreports.wordpress.com/


Original Source : Information Technology Market
Buy Now : Market Research Report

Read More

Browse the complete Report onUnited States Shipping Report Q3 2010

Browse All Business Monitor International Market Research Reports

In Q210 the news emanating from the US maritime sector was positive with encouraging throughput data from ports such as Los Angeles (LA), Charleston, Seattle and Savannah chiming with recent Chinese trade data, which revealed a sharp rise in Chinese exports in May, including 48.5% y-o-y growth in exports to US$131.76bn. Many observers have taken the figures as a sign of a recovery in global trade activity. Indeed, Los Angeles can be seen as a reliable bellwether for transpacific trade volumes and, in 2009, was close to matching the 12% contraction in international trade volumes as it registered a 14% decrease in its container handling volumes. Container lines in particular have been quick to seize the opportunity to profit from the increase in trade demand by raising rates. Members of the Transpacific Stabilization Agreement (TSA) have successfully introduced a series of rate increases, and there are rumours of a further US$50-100 per TEU increase to be introduced in the next few weeks.
Running parallel to BMI's optimism surrounding the transpacific market, however, is our projection of a potential slowdown in the US economy in H210, which stands to affect demand for container shipping services. In our opinion, the strong growth trend in transpacific trade seen in H110 has, for the most part, been underpinned by restocking by US exporters who, during the nadir of the global economic downturn, allowed inventories to run threadbare. An improvement in US economic output in Q409 and this year prompted firms to replenish stocks, with growth driven in large part by the knock-on effects of the government's fiscal stimulus programme.
In recent weeks there have been indications that the stimulatory effects of government spending are beginning to fizzle out, with the Telegraph reporting in May 2010 that US money supply contracted by an annualised rate of 9.6% in the three months to April 2010. Concerns over slowing aggregate demand were deepened by news of a 1.2% month-on-month (m-o-m) fall in US retail sales in May, the steepest monthly contraction since October 2009. Sales by department stores were among the worst affected, registering a 1.8% contraction in volume terms. Though the latest data have yet to filter through into actual trade volumes or port throughput, news of slowing sales will be of concern to importers, and in particular shippers of Chinese-produced manufactured goods. Wary of a further decline in consumer demand, BMI believes shippers will be under pressure to reduce orders over the next few weeks, which threatens to have a marked effect on shipping volumes and port throughput.
In 2010, BMI sees US trade volumes, which fell by 11.9% in real terms last year, growing at a brisk 7.8% with imports and exports increasing by 7.7% and 7.9% respectively. In nominal terms, imports will expand by 5.9% to US$2.07trn after a recession-fuelled contraction of 22.9% last year. We expect the strongest growth in value terms will be registered by fuels, followed by ores and metals and then iron and steel. With the impetus of President Barack Obama's National Export Initiative (NEI) behind it, export growth will be marginally greater than the rise in imports in value terms - up by 7.9% to US$1.59trn. The biggest export growth categories, measured in value will be fuels, ores and metals and iron and steel, in that order.
A recovery is forecast at ports across the US, through the growth in throughput is unlikely to be enough to offset the considerable contraction suffered by many facilities. At the country's largest west coast port, LA, BMI is forecasting 6.7% growth in total tonnage thisin 2010, after a contraction of 18.4% last year. By the end of 2010, LA will have handled 52.06mn tonnes. At the east coast port of New York/ New Jersey (NY/NJ), meanwhile, tonnage throughput, which fell by 20.8% in 2009, will grow by just 0.8% in real terms to 122.5mn tonnes.
In the container shipping sector the recovery is also expected to be muted with a growth of 4.6% expected at LA compared with an increase of 1.9% y-o-y at NY/NJ. By the end of 2010 LA is projected to have handled 7.06mn TEUs with NY/NJ handling 4.65mn TEUs.


About Us
ReportsandReports comprises an online library of 10,000 reports, in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets, and 25 industry specific websites. Our client list boasts almost all well-known publishers of such reports across the globe. We as a third-party reseller of market research reports employ a number of marketing tools, such as press releases, email-marketing and effective search-engine optimization techniques to drive revenues for our clients. We also provide 24/7 online and offline support service to our customers.


Contact:
Ms. Sunita
7557 Rambler road,
Suite 727, Dallas, TX 75231
Tel: +1-888-989-8004
http://reportsandreports.blogspot.com/
http://reportsandreports.proarticles.co.uk/
http://reportsnreports.wordpress.com/


Original Source : United States Shipping Market
Buy Now : Market Research Report

Read More

Browse the complete Report on: United States Power Report 2010
Browse All Business Monitor International Market Research Reports
The new US Power Report from BMI forecasts the country will account for 57.46% of Developed Markets power generation by 2014, and will retain an electricity export capability. BMI’s Developed Markets power generation estimate for 2009 is 7,152 terawatt hours (TWh), representing a decrease of 4.8% over the previous year. We are forecasting a rise in regional generation to 7,745TWh between 2010 and 2014, representing an increase of 6.0%.
Thermal power generation in 2009 is estimated by BMI at 4,199TWh, accounting for 58.7% of the total electricity supplied in the region. Our forecast for 2014 is 4,439TWh, implying 5.7% growth that leaves the market share of thermal generation only slightly lower at 57.3% – in spite of environmental concerns that should be promoting renewables, hydro-electricity and nuclear generation. US thermal generation in 2009 was 2,909TWh, or 69.27% of the regional total. By 2014, the country is expected to account for 68.73% of thermal generation.
For the US, oil is the leading fuel, accounting for 38.6% of primary energy demand (PED), followed by gas at 27.0%, coal at 22.8% and nuclear with an 8.7% share of PED. Developed markets energy demand is forecast to reach 3,998mn tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) by 2014, representing 6.5% growth in 2010- 2014. The US 2009 market share of 59.39% is set to fall to 58.62% by 2014. The 849TWh of US nuclear demand in 2009 is forecast to reach 864TWh by 2014, with its share of the Developed Markets nuclear market easing from 1.34% to 50.20% over the period.
BMI is now forecasting US real GDP growth averaging 2.22% per annum between 2010 and 2014, with the 2010 forecast being an increase of 2.80%. Population is expected to expand from 307.5mn to 322.7mn over the period with GDP per capita rising 14%, but electricity consumption per capita forecast increasing by just 1%. The country’s power consumption is expected to increase from an estimated 3,766TWh in 2009 to 4,029TWh by the end of the forecast period, providing surplus capacity rising from an estimated 384TWh in 2009 to 421TWh in 2014, assuming 1.4% average annual growth in power production during 2010-2014.
The volume of power generated by the individual member states varies dramatically, from almost 406TWh in Texas (9.8% of the US total), to less than 6TWh (0.16%) in Vermont. The top 10 US power producers account for more than 47% of the country’s total net generation. The lowest level of fossil fuel use in the top 10 is registered by Illinois and New York. Both derive less than half of their power generation from coal, gas and oil. Nuclear is the dominant fuel in both cases, with Illinois relying on reactors for 47.8% of its power, while New York has 29.1% nuclear dependency. It is also a major user of hydro-electric power, accounting for 17.3% of 2008 generation. In the top 10 power producers, Indiana is the most fossil fuel-intensive, deriving 94% of its electricity from coal-burning facilities and a further 5.1% from gas-fired power stations.
Between 2010 and 2019, we are forecasting an increase in US electricity generation of 14.2%, which is middle of the range for the developed markets. This equates to 8.1% in the 2014-2019 period, up from 5.7% in 2010-2014. PED growth is set to ease from 5.8% in 2010-2014 to 4.6% during 2014-2019, representing 10.7% for the entire forecast period. An increase of 29% in hydro-power use during 2010- 2019 is one key element of generation growth. Thermal power generation is forecast to rise by 10% between 2010 and 2019, with nuclear use up 10%. More details of the longer-term BMI power forecasts can be found later in this report.
About Us
ReportsandReports comprises an online library of 10,000 reports, in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets, and 25 industry specific websites. Our client list boasts almost all well-known publishers of such reports across the globe. We as a third-party reseller of market research reports employ a number of marketing tools, such as press releases, email-marketing and effective search-engine optimization techniques to drive revenues for our clients. We also provide 24/7 online and offline support service to our customers.
 Contact:
Ms. Sunita
7557 Rambler road,
Suite 727, Dallas, TX 75231
Tel: +1-888-989-8004
http://reportsandreports.blogspot.com/
http://reportsandreports.proarticles.co.uk/
http://reportsnreports.wordpress.com/
Original Source : – United States Power Market
Buy Now : Market Research Report

Read More

Browse the complete Report on : United States Insurance Report Q4 2010

Browse All Business Monitor International Market Research Reports

This is BMI’s third report on the US’ insurance sector. The main aim of this report is to analyse the US’ non-life and life insurance segments in a global context.
One of the challenges revolves around the way in which accident and health insurance is treated. In most countries whose insurance sectors are surveyed by BMI, health insurance is considered part of the nonlife segment. In the US, however, only is small proportion of the entire health insurance sector is provided by property/casualty insurers, which are broadly analogous to non-life or general insurers in other countries. A larger proportion of health insurance is provided by life/health insurers, which, but for their involvement in accident and health insurance, would be broadly analogous to life insurers in other countries. However, the majority of health insurance coverage is provided by specialist health insurance plans, which are considered generally (and by us) to lie outside the mainstream insurance sector.
In order to determine a data series for the US non-life segment that is consistent with those calculated for other countries, we have used as a starting point the property and casualty direct premiums disclosed by the Insurance Information Institute (III) in its 2010 Insurance Fact Book. We have added the net health insurance premiums identified by the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) in its annual statistical publications. Accordingly, we consider that non-life premiums rose from US$598.83bn in 2005 to US$637.20bn in 2006, US$651.08bn in 2007 and US$654.65bn in 2008. These figures include health premiums written by life insurers that rose from US$118.69bn in 2005 to US$141.20bn in 2006, US$151.46bn in 2007 and US$165.03bn in 2008. In relation to 2009, we have assumed that gross premiums contracted by 2%. The III’s review of the Property & Casualty insurers’ 2009 results noted that net premiums shrunk by 3.7%.
Net premiums in Q110 were 1.3% lower than they had been in the previous corresponding period. 2009 marks the first occasion since the Great Depression of the 1930s that net premiums have fallen for three consecutive years. For the time being, we are looking for another 2% contraction in premiums in 2010. Meanwhile, life premiums (actually mostly contributions to individual and group annuities, together with premiums for individual and group life insurance, together with minor lines), rose from US$447.30bn in 2005 to US$478.48bn in 2006, US$515.26bn in 2007 and US$520.92bn in 2008. It appears to us that the health plans wrote around US$437bn in 2008. This is not included in our figures.
However, 2009 was a particularly challenging year for the life segment. A study of the top 25 life/health insurance companies by AM Best, which was published in March 2010, found that net premiums of these organisations contracted by 17.9% to US$465bn in 2009. In its annual review of the global insurance industry, Swiss Re indicated that life premiums in the US fell by 15%. This slump was ‘unprecedented’, as ‘weakening consumer demand and capacity constraints adversely impacted new business in all major business lines.’
Unsurprisingly, given the volatility of global financial markets in Q408, savings and equity-linked products suffered the most.
For the time being, we are looking for life premiums to contract by another 2% over 2010 as a whole. Nevertheless, we recognise that sales of particular products may contract by much more than this. According to figures published by Beacon Research and the Insured Retirement Institute, and cited by Best’s Insurance News, sales of individual fixed annuities in Q110 fell by 52% - relative to the previous corresponding period – to US$16.7bn or so.
The US insurance sector accounts for about one-quarter of total premiums written by non-life and life companies worldwide. Around one-third of all reinsurance sold worldwide is bought by US firms. Aside from its absolute size, we suggest that it stands out from other national insurance markets for the following reasons:
It is comparatively fragmented, even though a process of consolidation has been underway for some years. Companies such as State Farm (in the non-life segment) and MetLife (in the life segment) have powerful brands, access to economies of scale and several other advantages. Nevertheless, their respective 12% of total property/casualty premiums and 13% of life/health premiums are unusually large in that they are in double digits. Even in analyses of particular lines, double-digit market shares are the exception rather than the norm. Among the health plans, whose premiums we have not included in the premium figures discussed above, the largest player appears to be United Health Group, with a market share of 13%.
Mutuals account for substantial minority of the market. Conventional wisdom would suggest that, in the country with the world’s largest and most sophisticated capital markets, almost all insurance companies would be listed public companies in order to facilitate access to capital. The success and size of companies like New York Life and State Farm is that some of the leading players do not need such access and instead focus on delivering the benefits of mutual status to their policyholders/ members.
Foreign groups account for about one-eighth of each of the non-life and the life segments. Zurich is the largest foreign player in the overall non-life segment, while ING, AEGON and John Hancock have top- 10 positions in the overall life segment. The foreign groups present all have the economies of scale, both within the US and in their businesses elsewhere, to compete.
The US is too big for foreign multinationals to ignore. Absolute size of the opportunity that is available to foreign multinationals means that all large companies with international aspirations should have clear reasons for not being active in the US – if that is their decision. The US economy and insurance sector may not be growing as rapidly as that of say China, but the restrictions and the relative sizes of entrenched local players are far less of a problem. Furthermore, the regulatory environment if vastly more transparent.
Similarly, the vast majority of US insurance companies see no need to pursue expansion abroad. We estimate that AIG accounted for one-sixth of non-life premiums and one-third of life premiums written by US companies outside the US in 2006. In spite of AIG’s well publicised financial problems – which do not stem from its traditional property/casualty or life/health businesses – we suspect that the same is broadly true today. In spite of its disposal of key businesses in Brazil and Taiwan over the last year or so and many smaller assets, AIG is still the US insurer with the largest global footprint. However, its global orientation makes AIG the exception rather than the rule.
Reinsurance is the main section of the market where foreign and (ultimately) foreign-owned companies have the edge. The Lloyd’s market in London, leading Bermuda-based reinsurers, such as XL and multinationals such as Swiss Re, Munich Re and Hanover Re, account for about 80% of the reinsurance premiums written annually in the US.
Unsurprisingly, auto-related lines are enormous businesses for the non-life insurers. In 2008, for instance, private passenger auto premiums amounted to more than US$160.0bn, while commercial auto premiums were in excess of US$26.0bn. However, the sophistication of the US non-life market, together with the high level of litigiousness, means that auto-related lines are a smaller percentage of total non-life premiums than they are in other countries. Conversely, liability insurance is more important in the US than it is in most other markets. Medical malpractice liability insurance alone, for instance, is a US$11.0bn business.
The popularity of individual annuities is an aspect of the US life sector which sets it apart from its counterparts in other countries. Annuities can be fixed or variable, immediate or deferred and are distributed through a variety of channels. In 2008, contributions to ordinary individual annuities were more than US$220.0bn. Contributions to group annuities were nearly US$127.0bn. Ordinary life and group life insurance premiums were US$137.0bn and nearly US$31.0bn respectively.
Diversity in distribution channels is a distinctive feature. In most countries whose insurance sectors are surveyed by BMI, insurers tend collectively to focus on one or two distribution channels. In the US, however, both non-life and life insurers are substantial users of tied agents, independent brokers, in-house sales networks, direct sales channels (including the internet) and (for life insurers), stockbrokers, financial planners and banks. This is another sign of the competitive pressures.
Aside from focusing on particular distribution channels, insurance companies also differentiate themselves by pricing, product features and brand.
Competitive pressures contribute to the typically slow growth rates of both non-life and life segments. Life penetration is also constrained by the abundance of organised savings products that fall outside the purview of the insurance sector. Nevertheless, the absolute increases in premiums that BMI forecasts for the next five years are substantial.
There is no federal regulator of the entire insurance sector. Insurers are subject to regulation by the relevant authority in the state in which they are chartered and must be licensed by regulators in other states in which they operate. Some companies are arguing for a federal regulator to be set up. However, although the existing regime gives rise to interstate inconsistencies and additional costs, it has generally served the insurers and their customers well. Aside from AIG, whose problems did not originate in its insurance businesses, failures of insurance companies have tended to be few and small. The US is an important domicile for captive insurance companies. This is despite the proximity and attractions of well-established offshore domiciles such as Bermuda and the Cayman Islands


About Us

ReportsandReports comprises an online library of 10,000 reports, in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets, and 25 industry specific websites. Our client list boasts almost all well-known publishers of such reports across the globe. We as a third-party reseller of market research reports employ a number of marketing tools, such as press releases, email-marketing and effective search-engine optimization techniques to drive revenues for our clients. We also provide 24/7 online and offline support service to our customers.


Contact:

Ms. Sunita
7557 Rambler road,
Suite 727, Dallas, TX 75231
Tel: +1-888-989-8004
http://reportsandreports.blogspot.com/
http://reportsandreports.proarticles.co.uk/
http://reportsnreports.wordpress.com/

Read More

Browse the complete Report on : United States Commercial Banking Report Q4 2010

Browse All Business Monitor International Market Research Reports

Since Q108, we have described numerically the banking business environment for each of the countries surveyed by BMI. We do this through our Commercial Banking Business Environment Rating (CBBER), a measure that ensures we capture the latest quantitative information available. It also ensures consistency across all countries and between the inputs to the CBBER and the Insurance Business Environment Rating, which is likewise now a feature of our insurance reports. Like the Business Environment Ratings calculated by BMI for all the other industries on which it reports, the CBBER takes into account the limits of potential returns and the risks to the realisation of those returns. It is weighted 70% to the former and 30% to the latter.
The evaluation of the Limits of Potential Returns includes market elements that are specific to the banking industry of the country in question and elements that relate to that country in general. Within the 70% of the CBBER that takes into account the Limits of Potential Returns, the market elements have a 60% weighting and the country elements have a 40% weighting. The evaluation of the Risks to Realisation of Returns also includes banking elements and country elements (specifically, BMI’s assessment of long-term country risk). However, within the 30% of the CBBER that takes into account the risks, these elements are weighted 40% and 60%, respectively.
Further details on how we calculate the CBBER are provided at the end of this report. In general, though, three aspects need to be borne in mind in interpreting the CBBERs. The first is that the market elements of the Limits of Potential Returns are by far the most heavily weighted of the four elements. They account for 60% of 70% (or 42%) of the overall CBBER. Second, if the market elements are significantly higher than the country elements of the Limits of Potential Returns, it usually implies that the banking sector is (very) large and/or developed relative to the general wealth, stability and financial infrastructure in the country. Conversely, if the market elements are significantly lower than the country elements, it usually means that the banking sector is small and/or underdeveloped relative to the general wealth, stability and financial infrastructure in the country. Third, within the Risks to Realisation of Returns category, the market elements (ie: how regulations affect the development of the sector, how regulations affect competition within it, and Moody’s Investors Service’s ratings for local currency deposits) can be markedly different from BMI’s long-term risk rating.

About Us

ReportsandReports comprises an online library of 10,000 reports, in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets, and 25 industry specific websites. Our client list boasts almost all well-known publishers of such reports across the globe. We as a third-party reseller of market research reports employ a number of marketing tools, such as press releases, email-marketing and effective search-engine optimization techniques to drive revenues for our clients. We also provide 24/7 online and offline support service to our customers.


Contact:

Ms. Sunita
7557 Rambler road,
Suite 727, Dallas, TX 75231
Tel: +1-888-989-8004
http://reportsandreports.blogspot.com/

http://reportsandreports.proarticles.co.uk/

http://reportsnreports.wordpress.com/

Read More

Browse the complete Report on : United States Real Estate Report Q4 2010


Browse All Business Monitor International Market Research Reports

For at least a decade prior to 2008, the growth of the US economy has been driven by consumption spending which, in turn, has grown faster than household incomes. This had been possible only because consumers had been taking advantage of actual or expected rises in residential real estate prices to fund their spending.
The end of this phase in US economic history is well understood. Because of a lack of discipline on the part of the US financial services industry, the country found itself with a glut of residential real estate (concentrated in particular states). Even if labour market conditions improve markedly, it will be a while before consumer spending to return to the growth rates which prevailed prior to 2008. Over the medium term, the overall growth of the US economy will likely be anaemic.
This very uninspiring prospect for the economy was incorporated into the commercial Real Estate sector in 2009. Commercial rents fell sharply over the course of 2010. Nevertheless, the second round of interviews with our in-country sources, which was conducted in July 2010, indicates that rents are finally stabilising. Further, they are expected to rise by 5-10% next year.
BMI surveys the real estate sectors of 44 countries, out of these, the USA is unusual in that its yields have risen – in most cities and sub-sectors – over the last year or so. Increased yields were reported by our sources in each of the five cities from which we collect data – New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas and Philadelphia. The liquidity and efficiency of the US commercial real estate sector is such that not only have property prices and capital values dropped, they have fallen further than rental rates.
Although some of our sources indicated that, in their cities, there are substantial amounts of vacant space in at least one of the major sub-sectors, overall vacancy rates are quite low. In general, there has been far less overbuilding in the commercial real estate sector as a whole than in the residential real estate sector. The fundamental problem is that many tenants (including some that are owners/investors in their own right) are unwilling or unable to pay rent at the rates which had been prevailing prior to 2008.
We believe that the process of adjustment still has some way to run. Although the hard numbers vary from city to city, rental rates need to fall further until existing tenants become inclined to upgrade their accommodation or to increase the space they are occupying. Prices and capital values need to adjust downwards faster than rental rates and this scenario will continue until owners and investors consider that yields are sufficiently high and that they compensate adequately for the new – and rather dismal – environment. Philadelphia appears to be the only one of the five cities from which we collected data where rental rates are near a trough.
Therefore, in projecting yields, BMI assumes they will stabilise in Philadelphia from 2010 but continue to rise to the end of 2012 in the other four cities. Thereafter, yields should remain reasonably stable in all three sub-sectors. Given the constraints on US consumers, we assume that there will be minimal growth in rents in the retail sector through the forecast period. However, it is possible that office rents and industrial rents will be rising gently by 2013 and 2014.
Key Features Of This Report
This is the latest edition of a new series of industry reports published by BMI that seeks to identify the key dynamics of the real estate sectors of 44 countries around the world, some of which are developed and some of which are, in every sense, emerging markets. Once again, the questions that we seek to answer for each country remain as follows: What are the main issues that will matter to actors in and around real estate development in the country concerned, both over the long and the short term? What are the main constraints that they face? What are the key insights that one garners when one compares the real estate sector of the country concerned with its peers in other countries?
In Q3 we have introduced a very substantial new improvement to the reports. We have incorporated data and qualitative observations provided to us by commercial real estate agents operating in the countries we survey. As a result we have gained a much clearer picture of the balance between demand and supply in each of three main sub-sectors – office, retail and industrial. We have also introduced a new approach to the forecasting of rental yields, which is discussed in the methodology sector of this report.
The forecasting of rental yields, which is discussed in the methodology sector of this report. In Q4, we have incorporated a lot of new data in relation to rents and yields in 2010. We gained this data by way of a new round of interviews with our in-country sources in mid-2010. In some cases, the latest information from our sources has caused us to make significant revisions to our forecasts for 2011-2014.
We asked our sources to indicate what growth in rents is likely for 2011. We explain their answers in the Forecast Scenarios.


About Us

ReportsandReports comprises an online library of 10,000 reports, in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets, and 25 industry specific websites. Our client list boasts almost all well-known publishers of such reports across the globe. We as a third-party reseller of market research reports employ a number of marketing tools, such as press releases, email-marketing and effective search-engine optimization techniques to drive revenues for our clients. We also provide 24/7 online and offline support service to our customers.


Contact:

Ms. Sunita
7557 Rambler road,
Suite 727, Dallas, TX 75231
Tel: +1-888-989-8004
http://reportsandreports.blogspot.com/

http://reportsandreports.proarticles.co.uk/

http://reportsnreports.wordpress.com/

Read More

Dallas, TX: ReportsandReports announce it will carry United States Wound Care Management Market Outlook to 2016 Market Research Report in its Store.

Browse complete United States Wound Care Management Market Outlook to 2016 Report

GlobalData’s new report, “US Wound Care Management Market Outlook to 2016” provides key market data on the US wound care management market. The report provides value (USD million), volume (units) and average price (USD) data for each segment and sub-segment within seven market categories – advanced wound management, compression therapy, ostomy drainage bags, traditional wound management, wound closure devices, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), and pressure relief devices. The report also provides company shares and distribution shares data for each of the aforementioned market categories. The report is supplemented with global corporate-level profiles of the key market participants with information on company financials and pipeline products, wherever available.

This report is built using data and information sourced from proprietary databases, primary and secondary research and in-house analysis by GlobalData’s team of industry experts.

Scope

  • Market size and company share data for wound care management market categories advanced wound management, compression therapy, ostomy drainage bags, traditional wound management, wound closure devices, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), and pressure relief devices.
  • Annualized market revenues (USD million), volume (units) and average price (USD) data for each of the segments and sub-segments within seven market categories. Data from 2002 to 2009, forecast forward for 7 years to 2016.
  • 2009 company shares and distribution shares data for each of the seven market categories.
  • Global corporate-level profiles of key companies operating within the US wound care management market.
  • Key players covered include ConvaTec, Coloplast, Covidien, Smith & Nephew, Ethicon, Kinetic Concepts, Hartmann, Molnlycke Health Care, and 3M Health Care.

Reasons to buy

  • Develop business strategies by identifying the key market categories and segments poised for strong growth.
  • Develop market-entry and market expansion strategies.
  • Design competition strategies by identifying who-stands-where in the US wound care management competitive landscape.
  • Develop capital investment strategies by identifying the key market segments expected to register strong growth in the near future.
  • What are the key distribution channels and what’s the most preferred mode of product distribution – Identify, understand and capitalize.

Table of Content

1.1 List of Tables 10

1.2 List of Figures 13

2 Introduction 16

2.1 What is This Report About? 16

3 Wound Care Management In United States 17

3.1 Wound Care Management, Market Segmentation 17

3.2 Wound Care Management, United States, Overall Revenue ($m), 2002-2016 18

3.3 Wound Care Management Market, United States, Revenue Mix ($m), 2009 20

3.4 Wound Care Management Market, United States, Category Contribution (%), 2009 21

3.5 Wound Care Management, United States, Category Volume (Units), 2002-2016 27

3.6 Wound Care Management, United States, Company Share (2008-2009) 33

4 Advanced Wound Management In United States 34

4.1 Advanced Wound Management, Market Segmentation 34

4.2 Advanced Wound Management Market, United States, Revenue Mix ($m), 2009 35

4.3 Advanced Wound Management Market, United States, Category Contribution (%), 2009 36

4.4 Advanced Wound Management Overall Revenue (2002-2016) 37

4.5 Advanced Wound Management Overall Volume (2002-2016) 41

4.6 Advanced Wound Management Average Price (2002-2016) 45

4.7 Advanced Wound Management Distribution Share (2008-2009) 46

4.8 Advanced Wound Management, United States, Company Share (2008-2009) 47

5 Compression Therapy In United States 49

5.1 Compression Therapy, Market Segmentation 49

5.2 Compression Therapy Market, United States, Revenue Mix ($m), 2009 50

5.3 Compression Therapy Market, United States, Category Contribution (%), 2009 51

5.4 Compression Therapy Overall Revenue (2002-2016) 52

5.5 Compression Therapy Overall Volume (2002-2016) 60

5.6 Compression Therapy Average Price (2002-2016) 68

5.7 Compression Therapy Distribution Share (2008-2009) 69

5.8 Compression Therapy, United States, Company Share (2008-2009) 70

6 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) In United States 71

6.1 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT), Market Segmentation 71

6.2 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) Market, United States, Revenue Mix ($m), 2009 72

6.3 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) Market, United States, Category Contribution (%), 2009 73

6.4 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) Overall Revenue (2002-2016) 74

6.5 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) Overall Volume (2002-2016) 78

6.6 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) Average Price (2002-2016) 82

6.7 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) Distribution Share (2008-2009) 83

6.8 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT), United States, Company Share (2008-2009) 84

7 Ostomy Drainage Bags In United States 85

7.1 Ostomy Drainage Bags, Market Segmentation 85

7.2 Ostomy Drainage Bags Market, United States, Revenue Mix ($m), 2009 86

7.3 Ostomy Drainage Bags Market, United States, Category Contribution (%), 2009 87

7.4 Ostomy Drainage Bags Overall Revenue (2002-2016) 88

7.5 Ostomy Drainage Bags Overall Volume (2002-2016) 92

7.6 Ostomy Drainage Bags Average Price (2002-2016) 96

7.7 Ostomy Drainage Bags Distribution Share (2008-2009) 97

7.8 Ostomy Drainage Bags, United States, Company Share (2008-2009) 98

8 Pressure Relief Devices In United States 99

8.1 Pressure Relief Devices, Market Segmentation 99

8.2 Pressure Relief Devices Market, United States, Revenue Mix ($m), 2009 100

8.3 Pressure Relief Devices Market, United States, Category Contribution (%), 2009 101

8.4 Pressure Relief Devices Overall Revenue (2002-2016) 102

8.5 Pressure Relief Devices Overall Volume (2002-2016) 106

8.6 Pressure Relief Devices Average Price (2002-2016) 110

8.7 Pressure Relief Devices Distribution Share (2008-2009) 111

8.8 Pressure Relief Devices, United States, Company Share (2008-2009) 112

9 Traditional Wound Management In United States 113

9.1 Traditional Wound Management Overall Revenue (2002-2016) 113

9.2 Traditional Wound Management Overall Volume (2002-2016) 115

9.3 Traditional Wound Management Average Price (2002-2016) 117

9.4 Traditional Wound Management Distribution Share (2008-2009) 118

9.5 Traditional Wound Management, United States, Company Share (2008-2009) 119

10 Wound Closure Devices In United States 120

10.1 Wound Closure Devices, Market Segmentation 120

10.2 Wound Closure Devices Market, United States, Revenue Mix ($m), 2009 121

10.3 Wound Closure Devices Market, United States, Category Contribution (%), 2009 122

10.4 Wound Closure Devices Overall Revenue (2002-2016) 123

10.5 Wound Closure Devices Overall Volume (2002-2016) 127

10.6 Wound Closure Devices Average Price (2002-2016) 129

10.7 Wound Closure Devices Distribution Share (2008-2009) 130

10.8 Wound Closure Devices, United States, Company Share (2008-2009) 131

11 Overview of Key Companies in United States Wound Care Management Market 133

11.1 ConvaTec 133

11.2 Smith & Nephew Plc 134

11.3 Covidien plc 135

11.4 Kinetic Concepts, Inc. 136

11.5 Ethicon, Inc. 137

11.6 Hollister Incorporated 138

11.7 Advanced Medical Solutions Group plc 139

11.8 B. Braun Melsungen AG 139

11.9 Baxter International Inc. 140

11.10 Coloplast A/S 140

11.11 CONMED Corporation 141

11.12 Johnson & Johnson 142

11.13 Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation 142

11.14 Invacare Corporation 143

11.15 HARTMANN GROUP 143

11.16 Molnlycke Health Care AB 144

11.17 DeRoyal Industries, Inc. 144

11.18 BlueSky Medical Group, Inc. 144

11.19 Tyco Healthcare/Kendall 145

11.20 BSN medical GmbH 145

11.21 Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. 145

11.22 Sklar Instruments 146

11.23 Talley Group Limited 146

11.24 Nycomed International Management GmbH 147

11.25 3M Health Care 147

11.26 Derma Sciences, Inc. 148

11.27 Hydromer, Inc. 148

11.28 Forticell Bioscience, Inc. 149

11.29 TEI Biosciences, Inc. 149

11.30 Closure Medical Corporation 149

11.31 Ethox International, Inc. 150

11.32 Brown Medical Industries 150

11.33 Dynatronics Corporation 150

11.34 Hermell Products, Inc. 151

11.35 Southwest Technologies, Inc. 151

11.36 Anulex Technologies, Inc. 151

11.37 Therus Corporation 152

11.38 Xylos Corporation 152

11.39 Theregen, Inc. 152

11.40 Celleration, Inc. 153

11.41 United States Surgical (Inactive) 153

11.42 Organogenesis, Inc. 153

11.43 Regenesis Biomedical, Inc. 154

11.44 Pegasus Biologics, Inc. 154

11.45 FzioMed, Inc. 154

11.46 KeraCure, Inc. 155

11.47 Twin Star Medical, Inc. 155

11.48 SuturTek Incorporated 156

11.49 IYIA Technologies, Inc. 156

11.50 Span-America Medical Systems, Inc. 156

11.51 Genadyne Biotechnologies, Inc. 157

11.52 Advanced BioHealing, Inc. 157

11.53 Advanced Wound Technologies-MidAtlantic, LLC 157

11.54 Bacterin International, Inc. 158

11.55 Brasel Products, Inc. 158

11.56 BioCore Medical Technologies, Inc. 159

11.57 Biofisica, Inc. 159

11.58 Stratatech Corporation 159

11.59 Healagenics, Inc. 160

11.60 Soluble Systems, LLC 160

11.61 Buffalo Hospital Supply 160

11.62 Ceragenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 161

11.63 American Health Systems, Inc. 161

11.64 American Medical Industries 162

11.65 HARTMANN USA, Inc. 162

11.66 Cook Biotech Incorporated 162

11.67 Adhezion Biomedical, LLC 163

11.68 Ferris Mfg. Corp. 163

11.69 Coloplast Corporation 163

11.70 ACell, Inc. 164

11.71 DFB Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 164

11.72 Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc. 165

11.73 Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. 165

11.74 MedEfficiency, Inc. 166

11.75 Southwest Regional Wound Care Center 166

11.76 SAM Medical Products 166

11.77 Wound Care Technologies, LLC 167

11.78 Professional Wound Care Business 167

11.79 Kalypto Medical, Inc. 167

11.80 Wound Management Technologies, Inc. 168

11.81 Care-Tech Laboratories, Inc. 168

11.82 Adhesives Research, Inc. 169

11.83 CollMED Laboratories, Inc. 169

11.84 Eyedetec Medical, Inc. 169

12 Wound Care Management Market Pipeline Products 170

13 Financial Deals Landscape 176

13.1 Acquisition 176

13.2 Partnerships 183

14 Recent Developments 187

14.1 Strategy And Business Planning 187

14.2 Legal and Regulatory 190

14.3 Government and Public Interest 195

15 Appendix 201

15.1 Definitions of Markets Covered in the Report 202

15.2 Research Methodology 206

15.3 Secondary Research 207

15.4 Primary Research 207

15.5 Models 208

15.6 Forecasts 208

15.7 Expert Panels 208

15.8 GlobalData Consulting 208

15.9 Currency Conversion 209

15.10 Contact Us 209

15.11 Disclaimer 209

Browse complete United States Wound Care Management Market Outlook to 2016 Report

Browse all Medical Devices Market Research Reports

Browse all GlobalData Market Research Reports

Browse all Latest Report

Related Reports:

United Kingdom Wound Care Management Market Outlook to 2016

Japan Wound Care Management Market Outlook to 2016

South Africa Wound Care Management Market Outlook to 2016

About Us:
Reports and Reports comprises an online library of 10,000 reports, in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets, and 25 industry specific websites. Our client list boasts almost all well-known publishers of such reports across the globe. We as a third-party reseller of market research reports employ a number of marketing tools, such as press releases, email-marketing and effective search-engine optimization techniques to drive revenues for our clients. We also provide 24/7 online and offline support service to our customers.

Contact:
Ms. Sunita
7557 Rambler road,
Suite 727, Dallas, TX 75231
Tel: +1-888-989-8004
Website: http://www.reportsandreports.com/
Blog: http://reportsnreports.wordpress.com/
Blog: http://reportsandreports.blogspot.com/

Read More