Energy Market Landscape: Finland
http://www.reportsandreports.com/market-reports/energy-market-landscape-finland/
Evolving competitive dynamics are rapidly and significantly changing
the face of the gas and power markets in and around Europe. As such, a
timely and broadly based understanding of the market landscape is vital
for players throughout the energy value chain. Central to this is an
understanding of the exact stage of competitive development reached in
each market, and how it is likely to change.
Scope
- Up-to-date insight on market structures, regulatory developments, supply and demand balances, asset developments and player strategies.
- Insight into current levels of gas and power competitive intensity benchmarked against 33 relevant markets (EU 27 and 6 related countries).
- Forecasts of how the nine metrics making up the competitive intensity scores will change by 2012.
The MCI scores draw on nine underlying metrics grouped into three categories: Market Framework (Regulatory Effectiveness; Pricing Regime; Ease of Third Party Access), Supplier Push (Wholesale Fragmentation, Retail Fragmentation, Traded Market Maturity), and Customer Pull (Access to Market Information, Consumer Representation, Propensity to Switch)
Each of the Energy Market Landscape series provides a profile of both the relevant gas and power market. Issues examined include regulatory structures, player strategies and supply/demand dynamics. There is also a list of operational, planned and under construction infrastructure including power stations, pipelines, LNG terminals and storage sites
Reasons to Purchase
- Obtain up-to-date, relevant and standardized information on European and related energy markets from a single source.
- Have a logical framework to monitor market developments and emerging trends, identify opportunities and plan strategies accordingly.
- Assess current and future gas and power market competitive environments by gaining insight into factors driving market competitiveness.
Table Of contents
DATAMONITOR VIEW 1
CATALYST 1
SUMMARY 1
ANALYSIS 2
Gas Market Overview 2
Industry Landscape 2
Retail Market Players 2
Gas Supply and Demand Analysis 2
Gas Infrastructure 6
Pipelines 6
Electricity Market Overview 8
Industry Landscape 8
Retail Market Players 8
Wholesale Environment 9
Electricity Supply and Demand Analysis 9
Electricity Infrastructure 14
Generation Capacity 14
Electricity Networks 15
Competitive Intensity Analysis Overview 17
Datamonitor's MCI Index offers a robust framework for measuring the development of energy Market Competitive Intensity 17
The MCI Index shows how competitive a particular market is. This has applications for both new entrant seeking to enter the market, and established players and former monopoly incumbents seeking to defined their market share from new entrants. 17
The MCI Index assesses markets as they stood in early 2010 and forecasts conditions likely to be prevailing in July 2013, five years after full market opening 17
The MCI assessment draws on nine underlying metrics grouped into three broad clusters: Market framework; Supplier Push; Customer Pull 18
Each of the nine pillars has an assessment scale to allow for the comparison of diverse markets (see appendix for more details) 19
Gas Market Competitive Intensity 20
Finland's weak gas metrics create an MCI score very much at the lower end of the European scale 20
All of Finland's gas metrics score at the lower end of the scale 21
Finland's gas market framework scores are in stark contrast to those seen in the power sector 21
Effectiveness of Regulator [2010: 2.5/10 2013: 3/10] 21
Ease of Third Party Access [2010: 1/10 2013: 2/10] 21
Pricing Regime [2010: 5/10 2013: 6/10] 21
Supplier push metrics remain at the lower end of the scale throughout the forecast period 22
Wholesale Market Fragmentation [2010: 0.1/10 2013: 0.2/10] 22
Retail Market Fragmentation [2010: 0.1/10 2013: 0.2/10] 22
Traded Market Maturity [2010: 2.5/10 2013: 2.5/10] 22
Lack of switching and access to market information scores curtail the customer pull metrics 22
Access to Market Information and Assistance [2010: 0.1/10 2013: 0.1/10] 22
Consumer Representation [2010: 1.5/10 2013: 1.5/10] 22
Propensity to Switch [2010: 0.1/10 2013: 0.1/10] 22
Electricity Market Competitive Intensity 23
Finland's power market is more developed compared to many other EU nations 23
Finland's power customer pull metrics show particular weakness throughout the forecast period 24
Finland's Market Framework metrics reflect its position as a liberalized market 24
Effectiveness of Regulator [2010: 8.5/10 2013: 9/10] 24
Ease of Third Party Access [2010: 7/10 2013: 8/10] 25
Pricing Regime [2010: 5.5/10 2013: 7/10] 25
Supplier push metrics remain ahead of those seen in many other EU power markets 25
Wholesale Market Fragmentation [2010: 4.5/10 2013: 5.5/10] 25
Retail Market Fragmentation [2010: 8/10 2013: 8.5/10] 25
Traded Market Maturity [2010: 10/10 2013: 10/10] 25
Customer Pull scores generally reflect Finland's liberalized market structure 26
Access to Market Information and Assistance [2010: 7/10 2013: 8/10] 26
Consumer Representation [2010: 3/10 2013: 4/10] 26
Propensity to Switch [2010: 7/10 2013: 8/10] 26
All of Finland's market framework factors score highly 27
COMPETITIVE INTENSITY ANALYSIS APPENDIX 28
MCI Scores Summary 28
MCI Scoring Scales 31
APPENDIX 36
List of power stations in Finland 36
Definitions 40
Ask the analyst 41
Datamonitor consulting 41
Disclaimer 41
List of Tables
Table 1: Finland major gas retail market players, 2008 2
Table 2: Finland gas supply and demand balance, 2008─09e 3
Table 3: Finland gas transmission pipelines 7
Table 4: Finland major power retail players, 2008 8
Table 5: Finland power supply and demand balance, 2008─09e 10
Table 6: Finland system capacity 16
Table 7: Market Competitive Intensity, Finland 2010 and 2013 28
Table 8: MCI Additive, Europe 2010 and 2013 29
Table 9: MCI Multiplicative, Europe 2010 and 2013 30
Table 10: Finland power generation assets 36
List of Figures
Figure 1: Finland gas import supply sources, 2009e 4
Figure 2: Finland gas sectoral consumption, 2009e 5
Figure 3: Finland gas consumption, trends and forecasts, 1990─2020f 6
Figure 4: Finland power production by fuel type, 1990─2009e 11
Figure 5: Finland power production by fuel type, 2009e 12
Figure 6: Finland power sectoral consumption, 2009e 13
Figure 7: Finland power consumption, trends and forecasts, 1990─2020f 14
Figure 8: Finland power generation capacity by fuel type, 2008 15
Figure 9: MCI Assessment Scale 17
Figure 10: MCI Assessment Framework 18
Figure 11: MCI Scales 19
Figure 12: European Gas Market Competitive Intensity, 2010-13 20
Figure 13: Gas Market Competitive Intensity, Finland 21
Figure 14: European Power Market Competitive Intensity, 2010-13 23
Figure 15: Power Market Competitive Intensity, Finland 24
Figure 16: Market Competitive Intensity, Finland 27
Figure 17: Scale for MCI Assessment, Effectiveness of Regulator 31
Figure 18: Scale for MCI Assessment, Ease of Third Party Access 32
Figure 19: Scale for MCI Assessment, Pricing Regime 32
Figure 20: Scale for MCI Assessment, Wholesale Market Fragmentation 33
Figure 21: Scale for MCI Assessment, Retail Market Fragmentation 33
Figure 22: Scale for MCI Assessment, Traded Market Maturity 34
Figure 23: Scale for MCI Assessment, Access to Market Information 34
Figure 24: Scale for MCI Assessment, Consumer Representation 35
Figure 25: Scale for MCI Assessment, Propensity to Switch 35
DATAMONITOR VIEW 1
CATALYST 1
SUMMARY 1
ANALYSIS 2
Gas Market Overview 2
Industry Landscape 2
Retail Market Players 2
Gas Supply and Demand Analysis 2
Gas Infrastructure 6
Pipelines 6
Electricity Market Overview 8
Industry Landscape 8
Retail Market Players 8
Wholesale Environment 9
Electricity Supply and Demand Analysis 9
Electricity Infrastructure 14
Generation Capacity 14
Electricity Networks 15
Competitive Intensity Analysis Overview 17
Datamonitor's MCI Index offers a robust framework for measuring the development of energy Market Competitive Intensity 17
The MCI Index shows how competitive a particular market is. This has applications for both new entrant seeking to enter the market, and established players and former monopoly incumbents seeking to defined their market share from new entrants. 17
The MCI Index assesses markets as they stood in early 2010 and forecasts conditions likely to be prevailing in July 2013, five years after full market opening 17
The MCI assessment draws on nine underlying metrics grouped into three broad clusters: Market framework; Supplier Push; Customer Pull 18
Each of the nine pillars has an assessment scale to allow for the comparison of diverse markets (see appendix for more details) 19
Gas Market Competitive Intensity 20
Finland's weak gas metrics create an MCI score very much at the lower end of the European scale 20
All of Finland's gas metrics score at the lower end of the scale 21
Finland's gas market framework scores are in stark contrast to those seen in the power sector 21
Effectiveness of Regulator [2010: 2.5/10 2013: 3/10] 21
Ease of Third Party Access [2010: 1/10 2013: 2/10] 21
Pricing Regime [2010: 5/10 2013: 6/10] 21
Supplier push metrics remain at the lower end of the scale throughout the forecast period 22
Wholesale Market Fragmentation [2010: 0.1/10 2013: 0.2/10] 22
Retail Market Fragmentation [2010: 0.1/10 2013: 0.2/10] 22
Traded Market Maturity [2010: 2.5/10 2013: 2.5/10] 22
Lack of switching and access to market information scores curtail the customer pull metrics 22
Access to Market Information and Assistance [2010: 0.1/10 2013: 0.1/10] 22
Consumer Representation [2010: 1.5/10 2013: 1.5/10] 22
Propensity to Switch [2010: 0.1/10 2013: 0.1/10] 22
Electricity Market Competitive Intensity 23
Finland's power market is more developed compared to many other EU nations 23
Finland's power customer pull metrics show particular weakness throughout the forecast period 24
Finland's Market Framework metrics reflect its position as a liberalized market 24
Effectiveness of Regulator [2010: 8.5/10 2013: 9/10] 24
Ease of Third Party Access [2010: 7/10 2013: 8/10] 25
Pricing Regime [2010: 5.5/10 2013: 7/10] 25
Supplier push metrics remain ahead of those seen in many other EU power markets 25
Wholesale Market Fragmentation [2010: 4.5/10 2013: 5.5/10] 25
Retail Market Fragmentation [2010: 8/10 2013: 8.5/10] 25
Traded Market Maturity [2010: 10/10 2013: 10/10] 25
Customer Pull scores generally reflect Finland's liberalized market structure 26
Access to Market Information and Assistance [2010: 7/10 2013: 8/10] 26
Consumer Representation [2010: 3/10 2013: 4/10] 26
Propensity to Switch [2010: 7/10 2013: 8/10] 26
All of Finland's market framework factors score highly 27
COMPETITIVE INTENSITY ANALYSIS APPENDIX 28
MCI Scores Summary 28
MCI Scoring Scales 31
APPENDIX 36
List of power stations in Finland 36
Definitions 40
Ask the analyst 41
Datamonitor consulting 41
Disclaimer 41
List of Tables
Table 1: Finland major gas retail market players, 2008 2
Table 2: Finland gas supply and demand balance, 2008─09e 3
Table 3: Finland gas transmission pipelines 7
Table 4: Finland major power retail players, 2008 8
Table 5: Finland power supply and demand balance, 2008─09e 10
Table 6: Finland system capacity 16
Table 7: Market Competitive Intensity, Finland 2010 and 2013 28
Table 8: MCI Additive, Europe 2010 and 2013 29
Table 9: MCI Multiplicative, Europe 2010 and 2013 30
Table 10: Finland power generation assets 36
List of Figures
Figure 1: Finland gas import supply sources, 2009e 4
Figure 2: Finland gas sectoral consumption, 2009e 5
Figure 3: Finland gas consumption, trends and forecasts, 1990─2020f 6
Figure 4: Finland power production by fuel type, 1990─2009e 11
Figure 5: Finland power production by fuel type, 2009e 12
Figure 6: Finland power sectoral consumption, 2009e 13
Figure 7: Finland power consumption, trends and forecasts, 1990─2020f 14
Figure 8: Finland power generation capacity by fuel type, 2008 15
Figure 9: MCI Assessment Scale 17
Figure 10: MCI Assessment Framework 18
Figure 11: MCI Scales 19
Figure 12: European Gas Market Competitive Intensity, 2010-13 20
Figure 13: Gas Market Competitive Intensity, Finland 21
Figure 14: European Power Market Competitive Intensity, 2010-13 23
Figure 15: Power Market Competitive Intensity, Finland 24
Figure 16: Market Competitive Intensity, Finland 27
Figure 17: Scale for MCI Assessment, Effectiveness of Regulator 31
Figure 18: Scale for MCI Assessment, Ease of Third Party Access 32
Figure 19: Scale for MCI Assessment, Pricing Regime 32
Figure 20: Scale for MCI Assessment, Wholesale Market Fragmentation 33
Figure 21: Scale for MCI Assessment, Retail Market Fragmentation 33
Figure 22: Scale for MCI Assessment, Traded Market Maturity 34
Figure 23: Scale for MCI Assessment, Access to Market Information 34
Figure 24: Scale for MCI Assessment, Consumer Representation 35
Figure 25: Scale for MCI Assessment, Propensity to Switch 35
